These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34951848)

  • 1. Study of the Subjective and Objective Quality of High Motion Live Streaming Videos.
    Shang Z; Ebenezer JP; Wu Y; Wei H; Sethuraman S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1027-1041. PubMed ID: 34951848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of HDR Videos.
    Shang Z; Ebenezer JP; Venkataramanan AK; Wu Y; Wei H; Sethuraman S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2024; 33():42-57. PubMed ID: 37988212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Mobile Cloud Gaming Videos.
    Saha A; Chen YC; Davis C; Qiu B; Wang X; Gowda R; Katsavounidis I; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023; 32():3295-3310. PubMed ID: 37276105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blind prediction of natural video quality.
    Saad MA; Bovik AC; Charrier C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Mar; 23(3):1352-65. PubMed ID: 24723532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Subjective and Objective Study of Space-Time Subsampled Video Quality.
    Lee DY; Paul S; Bampis CG; Ko H; Kim J; Jeong SY; Homan B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():934-948. PubMed ID: 34965209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of Temporal Effects on Subjective Video Quality of Experience.
    Bampis CG; Zhi Li ; Moorthy AK; Katsavounidis I; Aaron A; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Nov; 26(11):5217-5231. PubMed ID: 28742036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video.
    Seshadrinathan K; Soundararajan R; Bovik AC; Cormack LK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Jun; 19(6):1427-41. PubMed ID: 20129861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FOVQA: Blind Foveated Video Quality Assessment.
    Jin Y; Patney A; Webb R; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():4571-4584. PubMed ID: 35767478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of 2D and 3D Foveated Video Compression in Virtual Reality.
    Jin Y; Chen M; Goodall T; Patney A; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():5905-5919. PubMed ID: 34125674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards Perceptually Optimized Adaptive Video Streaming-A Realistic Quality of Experience Database.
    Bampis CG; Li Z; Katsavounidis I; Huang TY; Ekanadham C; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():5182-5197. PubMed ID: 33877974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large-Scale Study of Perceptual Video Quality.
    Sinno Z; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 30222561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motion tuned spatio-temporal quality assessment of natural videos.
    Seshadrinathan K; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Feb; 19(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 19846374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Video quality assessment using motion-compensated temporal filtering and manifold feature similarity.
    Song Y; Yu M; Jiang G; Shao F; Peng Z
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175798. PubMed ID: 28445489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Salient motion features for video quality assessment.
    Ćulibrk D; Mirković M; Zlokolica V; Pokrić M; Crnojević V; Kukolj D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Apr; 20(4):948-58. PubMed ID: 20876020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content.
    Tu Z; Wang Y; Birkbeck N; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():4449-4464. PubMed ID: 33856995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Video quality pooling adaptive to perceptual distortion severity.
    Park J; Seshadrinathan K; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Feb; 22(2):610-20. PubMed ID: 23008260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting the Quality of Compressed Videos With Pre-Existing Distortions.
    Yu X; Birkbeck N; Wang Y; Bampis CG; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():7511-7526. PubMed ID: 34460374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual Video Quality Prediction Emphasizing Chroma Distortions.
    Chen LH; Bampis CG; Li Z; Sole J; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():1408-1422. PubMed ID: 33332266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using the Temporal Statistics of Global and Local Image Features.
    Varga D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the suitability of VMAF for quality assessment of medical videos: Medical ultrasound & wireless capsule endoscopy.
    Usman MA; Martini MG
    Comput Biol Med; 2019 Oct; 113():103383. PubMed ID: 31437625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.