These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34951848)

  • 21. Viewport-Based CNN: A Multi-Task Approach for Assessing 360° Video Quality.
    Xu M; Jiang L; Li C; Wang Z; Tao X
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2022 Apr; 44(4):2198-2215. PubMed ID: 33017289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Audio-Visual Signals.
    Min X; Zhai G; Zhou J; Farias MCQ; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2020 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 32324554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Screen Content Video Quality Assessment Model Using Hybrid Spatiotemporal Features.
    Zeng H; Huang H; Hou J; Cao J; Wang Y; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():6175-6187. PubMed ID: 36126028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detecting and Mapping Video Impairments.
    Goodall TR; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 30582540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recurrent and Dynamic Models for Predicting Streaming Video Quality of Experience.
    Bampis CG; Li Z; Katsavounidis I; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Jul; 27(7):3316-3331. PubMed ID: 29641409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating the role of content in subjective video quality assessment.
    Mirkovic M; Vrgovic P; Culibrk D; Stefanovic D; Anderla A
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():625219. PubMed ID: 24523643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An Efficient Method for No-Reference Video Quality Assessment.
    Agarla M; Celona L; Schettini R
    J Imaging; 2021 Mar; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 34460711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatiotemporal Statistics for Video Quality Assessment.
    Xuelong Li ; Qun Guo ; Xiaoqiang Lu
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3329-3342. PubMed ID: 27187966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ST-GREED: Space-Time Generalized Entropic Differences for Frame Rate Dependent Video Quality Prediction.
    Madhusudana PC; Birkbeck N; Wang Y; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():7446-7457. PubMed ID: 34449359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Quality.
    Ghadiyaram D; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jan; 25(1):372-87. PubMed ID: 26571530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Objective Video Quality Assessment Combining Transfer Learning With CNN.
    Zhang Y; Gao X; He L; Lu W; He R
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2020 Aug; 31(8):2716-2730. PubMed ID: 30736007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Study of Subjective Quality and Objective Blind Quality Prediction of Stereoscopic Videos.
    Appina B; Dendi SVR; Manasa K; Channappayya SS; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 May; ():. PubMed ID: 31094690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Blind Video Quality Assessment for Ultra-High-Definition Video Based on Super-Resolution and Deep Reinforcement Learning.
    Ying Z; Pan D; Shi P
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Video Quality Model of Compression, Resolution and Frame Rate Adaptation Based on Space-Time Regularities.
    Lee DY; Kim J; Ko H; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():3644-3656. PubMed ID: 35576411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. CVD2014-A Database for Evaluating No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Algorithms.
    Nuutinen M; Virtanen T; Vaahteranoksa M; Vuori T; Oittinen P; Hakkinen J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3073-86. PubMed ID: 27164589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Full-frame video stabilization with motion inpainting.
    Matsushita Y; Ofek E; Ge W; Tang X; Shum HY
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 Jul; 28(7):1150-63. PubMed ID: 16792103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting the Quality of Images Compressed after Distortion in Two Steps.
    Yu X; Bampis CG; Gupta P; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 31226076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contrastive Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Video Quality Assessment.
    Chen P; Li L; Wu J; Dong W; Shi G
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():458-471. PubMed ID: 34874856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quality assessment for wireless capsule endoscopy videos compressed via HEVC: From diagnostic quality to visual perception.
    Usman MA; Usman MR; Shin SY
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Dec; 91():112-134. PubMed ID: 29059590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An Optical Flow-Based Full Reference Video Quality Assessment Algorithm.
    K M; Channappayya SS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jun; 25(6):2480-92. PubMed ID: 27093720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.