These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34952772)
1. Surgical accuracy in 3D planned bimaxillary osteotomies: intraoral scans and plaster casts as digital dentition models. Beek DM; Baan F; Liebregts J; Bergé S; Maal T; Xi T Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jul; 51(7):922-928. PubMed ID: 34952772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A learning curve in 3D virtual surgical planned orthognathic surgery. Beek DM; Baan F; Liebregts J; Nienhuijs M; Bergé S; Maal T; Xi T Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3907-3915. PubMed ID: 37083986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the dimensional and morphological accuracy of three-dimensional digital dental casts digitized using different methods. Ye J; Wang S; Wang Z; Liu Y; Sun Y; Ye H; Zhou Y Odontology; 2023 Jan; 111(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 36068382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of Manual Transfer of the Clinical Natural Head Position: Influence on the Soft Tissue and Hard Tissue Position of 3-Dimensional Virtual Surgical Planning. Beek DM; Baan F; Liebregts J; Bergé S; Maal T; Xi T J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 80(9):1505-1510. PubMed ID: 35738421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How Accurate Is 3-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Planning for Segmental Maxillary Surgery? Kwon TG; Miloro M; Han MD J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Sep; 78(9):1597-1608. PubMed ID: 32464103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical accuracy of three-dimensional virtual planning: a pilot study of bimaxillary orthognathic procedures including maxillary segmentation. Stokbro K; Aagaard E; Torkov P; Bell RB; Thygesen T Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 26250603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Accuracy of Maxillary Positioning With Interim Splints Versus Patient-Specific Guides and Plates in Executing a Virtual Bimaxillary Surgical Plan. Jones JP; Amarista FJ; Jeske NA; Szalay D; Ellis E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 May; 80(5):827-837. PubMed ID: 35151639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Replacement of the Distorted Dentition of the Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans for Orthognathic Surgery Planning. Almutairi T; Naudi K; Nairn N; Ju X; Whitters J; Ayoub A J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1561.e1-1561.e8. PubMed ID: 29572134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of 3D virtual surgical planning for maxillary positioning and orientation in orthognathic surgery. Tonin RH; Iwaki Filho L; Yamashita AL; Ferraz FWDS; Tolentino ES; Previdelli ITDS; Brum B; Iwaki LCV Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 May; 23(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 31925879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of creating digital twins with different digital dentition models and cone-beam computed tomography. Lee JH; Lee HL; Park IY; On SW; Byun SH; Yang BE Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10603. PubMed ID: 37391453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with mandible first sequence: A retrospective study. Trevisiol L; Bersani M; Martinez Garza A; Alvarado E; Arnett GW; D'Agostino A J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2023 May; 51(5):280-287. PubMed ID: 37355372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Achievability of 3D planned bimaxillary osteotomies: maxilla-first versus mandible-first surgery. Liebregts J; Baan F; de Koning M; Ongkosuwito E; Bergé S; Maal T; Xi T Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9314. PubMed ID: 28839184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Virtual bite registration using intraoral digital scanning, CT and CBCT: In vitro evaluation of a new method and its implication for orthognathic surgery. Nilsson J; Richards RG; Thor A; Kamer L J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 27423538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of Mandible-First versus Maxilla-First Approach and of Thick versus Thin Splints for Skeletal Position after Two-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery. Borikanphanitphaisan T; Lin CH; Chen YA; Ko EW Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 147(2):421-431. PubMed ID: 33235045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhanced Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Skeletal Class III Facial Asymmetry by 3-Dimensional Surgical Simulation. Ko EW; Lin CH; Chen YA; Chen YR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 76(5):1073-1083. PubMed ID: 29031529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy and stability of the maxillary position after orthognathic surgery using a novel computer-aided surgical simulation system. Kim JW; Kim JC; Jeong CG; Cheon KJ; Cho SW; Park IY; Yang BE BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):18. PubMed ID: 30646896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does a learning curve exist for accuracy in three-dimensional planning for maxillary positioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery? Antonini F; Borba AM; Pagnoncelli RM; Han M; Markiewicz MR; Miloro M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 49(6):787-793. PubMed ID: 31706714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional cephalometric outcome predictability of virtual orthodontic-surgical planning in surgery-first approach. Badiali G; Bevini M; Gulotta C; Lunari O; Incerti Parenti S; Pironi M; Bianchi A; Felice P; Marchetti C Prog Orthod; 2022 Dec; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 36581697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One-year postoperative skeletal stability of 3D planned bimaxillary osteotomies: maxilla-first versus mandible-first surgery. Liebregts J; Baan F; van Lierop P; de Koning M; Bergé S; Maal T; Xi T Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):3000. PubMed ID: 30816184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with surgery first approach. Ying X; Tian K; Zhang K; Ma X; Guo H BMC Oral Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):529. PubMed ID: 34654418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]