These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34952878)
1. Comparison of conventional, doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Xun L; Zhai L; Xu H BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e052830. PubMed ID: 34952878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conventional, Doppler and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses. Liu Z; Yang F; Zhang Y; Yu H; Zhu H; Yang R; Fan L Cell Physiol Biochem; 2016; 39(6):2398-2408. PubMed ID: 27832653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound risk stratification for adnexal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Yi YY; Li C; Zhu WJ; Hou YL Clin Radiol; 2024 Sep; 79(9):e1167-e1175. PubMed ID: 38942707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation between hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chen Y; Zhu Y; Chen K; Wang H; Zhang W; Bao J; Wang W Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2021; 79(2):293-309. PubMed ID: 33935070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for differentiating mass-forming pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Yang J; Huang J; Zhang Y; Zeng K; Liao M; Jiang Z; Bao W; Lu Q Chin Med J (Engl); 2023 Sep; 136(17):2028-2036. PubMed ID: 36728948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with shear wave elastography in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chen X; Yu H; Wei N; Ozcan BB; An G; Wu Q; Wang N Gland Surg; 2023 Nov; 12(11):1610-1623. PubMed ID: 38107493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and superb microvascular imaging in differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhang Y; Sun X; Li J; Gao Q; Guo X; Liu JX; Gan W; Yang S Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2022; 81(2):109-121. PubMed ID: 35180108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis. Zhang B; Han X J Ultrasound Med; 2025 Jan; 44(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 39315743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to conventional ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant solid breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wubulihasimu M; Maimaitusun M; Xu XL; Liu XD; Luo BM Clin Radiol; 2018 Nov; 73(11):936-943. PubMed ID: 30297035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiating Benign From Malignant Ovarian Masses With Solid Components: Diagnostic Performance of CEUS Combined With IOTA Simple Rules and O-RADS. Lu B; He W; Liu C; Wang P; Yang P; Zhao Z; Qi J; Huang B Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Sep; 50(9):1449-1458. PubMed ID: 38876911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differential diagnosis of malignant and benign ovarian tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ma X; Zhao Y; Zhang B; Ling W; Zhuo H; Jia H; Li P Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 46(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 25644038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-Analysis: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Versus Conventional Ultrasound for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions. Li Q; Hu M; Chen Z; Li C; Zhang X; Song Y; Xiang F Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 May; 44(5):919-929. PubMed ID: 29530434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Qiao JJ; Yu J; Yu Z; Li N; Song C; Li M PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118872. PubMed ID: 25764442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conventional ultrasonography and elastosonography in diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhang D; Wang XN; Jiang L; Yu CX; Chen YN; Yu XJ; Pan MF Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():1082881. PubMed ID: 36686488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and in Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Meta-analysis. Zhang F; Li R; Li G; Jin L; Shi Q; Du L J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Apr; 38(4):903-914. PubMed ID: 30203542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhang Z; Ma C; Luo Y J Gastrointest Oncol; 2023 Apr; 14(2):626-635. PubMed ID: 37201077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Hu Q; Wang XY; Zhu SY; Kang LK; Xiao YJ; Zheng HY Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24436445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: A PRISMA compliant meta-analysis. Liu Q; Cheng J; Li J; Gao X; Li H Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Dec; 97(49):e13325. PubMed ID: 30544392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the diagnostic value of Jia Y; Gong W; Zhang Z; Tu G; Li J; Xiong F; Hou H; Zhang Y; Wu M; Zhang L J Thorac Dis; 2019 May; 11(5):2082-2098. PubMed ID: 31285902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Detection of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. Tufano A; Rosati D; Moriconi M; Santarelli V; Canale V; Salciccia S; Sciarra A; Franco G; Cantisani V; Di Pierro GB Curr Oncol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):818-827. PubMed ID: 38392054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]