125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34953190)
1. [Analysis of the fit quality of the metal frames on implants depending on the abutment taper].
Abakarov SI; Sorokin DV; Lapushko VY; Nikiforova KI
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2021; 100(6):56-60. PubMed ID: 34953190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pull-off Force of Four Different Implant Cements Between Zirconia Crowns and Titanium Implant Abutments in Two Different Abutment Heights.
Volkmann H; Rauch A; Koenig A; Schierz O
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2022; 42(3):e67-e74. PubMed ID: 35472113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision of fit and retention force of cast non-precious-crowns on standard titanium implant-abutment with different design and height.
Enkling N; Ueda T; Gholami H; Bayer S; Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 23551713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of cement type and abutment height on pull-off force of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns on titanium implant stock abutments: an in vitro study.
Müller L; Rauch A; Reissmann DR; Schierz O
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Nov; 21(1):592. PubMed ID: 34798850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abutments with reduced diameter for both cement and screw retentions: analysis of failure modes and misfit of abutment-crown-connections after cyclic loading.
Moris IC; Faria AC; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Apr; 28(4):432-436. PubMed ID: 26923302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical integrity of cement- and screw-retained zirconium-lithium silicate glass-ceramic crowns to Morse taper implants.
Vahey BR; Sordi MB; Stanley K; Magini RS; Novaes de Oliveira AP; Fredel MC; Henriques B; Souza JCM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):721-731. PubMed ID: 30093122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of air abrasion of metal implant abutments on the tensile bond strength of three luting agents used to cement implant superstructures: an in vitro study.
Jugdev J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Lynch E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):784-90. PubMed ID: 25032757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Undetected residual cement on standard or individualized all-ceramic abutments with cemented zirconia single crowns - a prospective randomized pilot trial.
Kappel S; Eiffler C; Lorenzo-Bermejo J; Stober T; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1065-71. PubMed ID: 26381392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant-abutment fit influences the mechanical performance of single-crown prostheses.
Ramalho IS; Bergamo ETP; Witek L; Coelho PG; Lopes ACO; Bonfante EA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Feb; 102():103506. PubMed ID: 31877515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.
Mehl C; Harder S; Shahriari A; Steiner M; Kern M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 23057023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
Mehl C; Harder S; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discrepancies in marginal and internal fits for different metal and alumina infrastructures cemented on implant abutments.
Faot F; Suzuki D; Senna PM; da Silva WJ; de Mattias Sartori IA
Eur J Oral Sci; 2015 Jun; 123(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 25809785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In Vitro Examination of the Use of Er:YAG Laser to Retrieve Lithium Disilicate Crowns from Titanium Implant Abutments.
Grzech-Leśniak K; Bencharit S; Dalal N; Mroczka K; Deeb JG
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):672-676. PubMed ID: 31125150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
