These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34953588)

  • 1. A multilayer affective computing model with evolutionary strategies reflecting decision-makers' preferences in process control.
    Su C; Ma X; Lv J; Tu T; Li H
    ISA Trans; 2022 Sep; 128(Pt B):565-578. PubMed ID: 34953588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multicriteria decision-making approach with hesitant interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets.
    Peng JJ; Wang JQ; Wang J; Chen XH
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():868515. PubMed ID: 24983009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel distance of intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and its-based prospect theory algorithm in multi-attribute decision making model.
    Ren H; Luo LJ
    Math Biosci Eng; 2020 Mar; 17(4):2905-2922. PubMed ID: 32987506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective allocation of resources in water pollution treatment alternatives: a multi-stage gray group decision-making method based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets.
    Wang J; Qian W; Du J; Liu Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(3):3173-3186. PubMed ID: 31838682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equilibrium approach towards water resource management and pollution control in coal chemical industrial park.
    Xu J; Hou S; Xie H; Lv C; Yao L
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Aug; 219():56-73. PubMed ID: 29730591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of operational and environmental benchmarks of retail stores to decision-makers' preferences through Data Envelopment Analysis.
    Álvarez-Rodríguez C; Martín-Gamboa M; Iribarren D
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 718():137330. PubMed ID: 32097840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorporating local researchers' and decision makers' preferences for groundwater resources management in a spatial multi-voiced decision model.
    Lima ML; Barilari A; Massone HE; Pascual M
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 302(Pt A):113954. PubMed ID: 34731703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public health emergency decision-making and management system sound research using rough set attribute reduction and blockchain.
    Wang H
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3600. PubMed ID: 35246582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for fuzzy classification in survival prediction.
    Jiménez F; Sánchez G; Juárez JM
    Artif Intell Med; 2014 Mar; 60(3):197-219. PubMed ID: 24525210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision-makers' preferences for approving new medicines in Wales: a discrete-choice experiment with assessment of external validity.
    Linley WG; Hughes DA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Apr; 31(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 23516033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fuzzy Group Consensus Decision Making and Its Use in Selecting Energy-Saving and Low-carbon Technology Schemes in Star Hotels.
    Lu P; Yang X; Wang ZJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 30235887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personalized next-best action recommendation with multi-party interaction learning for automated decision-making.
    Cao L; Zhu C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0263010. PubMed ID: 35085347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Residential curbside waste collection programs design: A multicriteria and participatory approach using choosing by advantages.
    Pérez C; Arroyo P; Richards C; Mourgues C
    Waste Manag; 2021 Jan; 119():267-274. PubMed ID: 33099071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Appraising patient preference methods for decision-making in the medical product lifecycle: an empirical comparison.
    Whichello C; Levitan B; Juhaeri J; Patadia V; DiSantostefano R; Pinto CA; de Bekker-Grob EW
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jun; 20(1):114. PubMed ID: 32560655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fuzzy incomplete linguistic preference relations.
    Wang TC; Huang SL
    Soft comput; 2023; 27(5):2299-2323. PubMed ID: 36540663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research use at the Ministry of Health in Burkina Faso: the decision-makers' perspective.
    Dagenais C
    Implement Sci Commun; 2021 Feb; 2(1):22. PubMed ID: 33597047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cumulative prospect theory-based method for group medical emergency decision-making with interval uncertainty.
    Sun J; Zhou X; Zhang J; Xiang K; Zhang X; Li L
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 May; 22(1):124. PubMed ID: 35524307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing decision-makers' access to economic evaluations: alternative methods of communicating the information.
    Thurston SJ; Craig D; Wilson P; Drummond MF
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18400117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A tuning algorithm for model predictive controllers based on genetic algorithms and fuzzy decision making.
    van der Lee JH; Svrcek WY; Young BR
    ISA Trans; 2008 Jan; 47(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17870075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.