These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34954422)

  • 1. Evaluating the reproducibility of research in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Rauh S; Bowers A; Rorah D; Tritz D; Pate H; Frye L; Vassar M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Feb; 269():24-29. PubMed ID: 34954422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of reproducible and transparent research practices in urology publications from 2014 to2018.
    Rauh S; Johnson BS; Bowers A; Tritz D; Vassar BM
    BMC Urol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):102. PubMed ID: 35820886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015-2017.
    Wallach JD; Boyack KW; Ioannidis JPA
    PLoS Biol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):e2006930. PubMed ID: 30457984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of reproducible and transparent research practices in pulmonology.
    Smith CA; Nolan J; Tritz DJ; Heavener TE; Pelton J; Cook K; Vassar M
    Pulmonology; 2021; 27(2):134-143. PubMed ID: 32739326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of transparent and reproducible research practices in the psychiatry literature.
    Sherry CE; Pollard JZ; Tritz D; Carr BK; Pierce A; Vassar M
    Gen Psychiatr; 2020; 33(1):e100149. PubMed ID: 32175523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do oncology researchers adhere to reproducible and transparent principles? A cross-sectional survey of published oncology literature.
    Walters C; Harter ZJ; Wayant C; Vo N; Warren M; Chronister J; Tritz D; Vassar M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e033962. PubMed ID: 31892667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature.
    Iqbal SA; Wallach JD; Khoury MJ; Schully SD; Ioannidis JP
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Jan; 14(1):e1002333. PubMed ID: 26726926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An analysis of key indicators of reproducibility in radiology.
    Wright BD; Vo N; Nolan J; Johnson AL; Braaten T; Tritz D; Vassar M
    Insights Imaging; 2020 May; 11(1):65. PubMed ID: 32394098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conflict of interest disclosure in obstetrics & gynecology.
    Slagle E; Sinacore J; Brubaker L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Nov; 118(5):1108-1110. PubMed ID: 22015879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating Reproducibility and Transparency in Emergency Medicine Publications.
    Johnson BS; Rauh S; Tritz D; Schiesel M; Vassar M
    West J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 22(4):963-971. PubMed ID: 35353995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of the practice of transparency and reproducibility in addiction medicine literature.
    Adewumi MT; Vo N; Tritz D; Beaman J; Vassar M
    Addict Behav; 2021 Jan; 112():106560. PubMed ID: 32763621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proliferation of gynaecological scientific societies and their financial transparency: an Italian survey.
    Vercellini P; Viganò P; Frattaruolo MP; Somigliana E
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e008370. PubMed ID: 26769777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disclosures, conflict of interest, and funding issues in urogynecology articles: a bibliometric study.
    Koch M; Riss P; Kölbl H; Umek W; Hanzal E
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1503-7. PubMed ID: 25990207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Evaluation of Nephrology Literature for Transparency and Reproducibility Indicators: Cross-Sectional Review.
    Fladie IA; Adewumi TM; Vo NH; Tritz DJ; Vassar MB
    Kidney Int Rep; 2020 Feb; 5(2):173-181. PubMed ID: 32043031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014-2017).
    Hardwicke TE; Thibault RT; Kosie JE; Wallach JD; Kidwell MC; Ioannidis JPA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2022 Jan; 17(1):239-251. PubMed ID: 33682488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducible and transparent research practices in published neurology research.
    Rauh S; Torgerson T; Johnson AL; Pollard J; Tritz D; Vassar M
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2020; 5():5. PubMed ID: 32161667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing Markers of Reproducibility and Transparency in Smoking Behaviour Change Intervention Evaluations.
    Norris E; He Y; Loh R; West R; Michie S
    J Smok Cessat; 2021; 2021():6694386. PubMed ID: 34306236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Number and quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics published in the top general medical and obstetrics and gynecology journals.
    Doulaveris G; Vani K; Saccone G; Chauhan SP; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100509. PubMed ID: 34656731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. True Reproducibility of UltraSound Techniques (TRUST): systematic review of reliability studies in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Coelho Neto MA; Roncato P; Nastri CO; Martins WP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 46(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 25175693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.