123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34954713)
1. Chylous ascites has a higher incidence after robotic surgery and is associated with poor recurrence-free survival after rectal cancer surgery.
Wang X; Zheng Z; Chen M; Huang S; Lu X; Huang Y; Chi P
Chin Med J (Engl); 2021 Dec; 135(2):164-171. PubMed ID: 34954713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incomplete lymphatic sealing around the inferior mesenteric artery is a risk factor for chylous ascites in robotic rectal cancer surgery.
Ushigome H; Takahashi H; Maeda A; Kato A; Harata S; Watanabe K; Yanagita T; Suzuki T; Shiga K; Harata K; Ogawa R; Matsuo Y; Mitsui A; Kimura M; Takiguchi S
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2023 Apr; 16(2):163-172. PubMed ID: 36127882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chylous ascites after colorectal cancer surgery: risk factors and impact on short-term and long-term outcomes.
Lee SY; Kim CH; Kim YJ; Kim HR
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 Dec; 401(8):1171-1177. PubMed ID: 27553111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chylous ascites as a complication of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Matsuda T; Fujita H; Kunimoto Y; Kimura T; Ogino K
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2013 Nov; 6(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 23941730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches.
Horsey ML; Parascandola SA; Sparks AD; Hota S; Ng M; Obias V
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 33638109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy].
Lan X; Xi H; Zhang K; Cui J; Li M; Chen L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 20(2):184-189. PubMed ID: 28226353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Successful laparoscopic ligation for massive chylous ascites after rectal cancer surgery.
Fukui Y; Shindoh J; Matoba S; Tomizawa K; Hanaoka Y; Toda S; Moriyama J; Kuroyanagi H
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2017 Feb; 10(1):55-58. PubMed ID: 27667785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study.
Huang CW; Su WC; Chang TK; Ma CJ; Yin TC; Tsai HL; Chen PJ; Chen YC; Li CC; Hsieh YC; Wang JY
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Nov; 18(1):308. PubMed ID: 33239020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors of chylous ascites and its relationship with long-term prognosis in laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer.
Qin W; Diao D; Ye K; Xu X; Shu D; Zhong H; Hu Y; Yang X; Aikemu B; Zhou L; Zhang S; Xue P; Cai Z; Zheng M; Li J; Wang Q; Sun Y; Feng B
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Sep; 407(6):2453-2462. PubMed ID: 35589848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic approach may be associated with a lower risk of lung metastases compared to laparoscopic approach for mid-low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a multivariate analysis on long-term recurrence patterns.
Piozzi GN; Rusli SM; Lee TH; Baek SJ; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Sep; 37(9):2085-2098. PubMed ID: 36042031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.
Lim DR; Bae SU; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surg Endosc; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1728-1737. PubMed ID: 27631313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A propensity-score matching analysis.
Chen TC; Liang JT
J Formos Med Assoc; 2022 Aug; 121(8):1532-1540. PubMed ID: 34789424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.
Kim J; Baek SJ; Kang DW; Roh YE; Lee JW; Kwak HD; Kwak JM; Kim SH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Mar; 60(3):266-273. PubMed ID: 28177988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No beneficial effect on survival but a decrease in postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer undergoing robotic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
Lei X; Yang L; Huang Z; Shi H; Zhou Z; Tang C; Li T
BMC Surg; 2021 Sep; 21(1):355. PubMed ID: 34583670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of postoperative chylous ascites after surgery for ovarian cancer: a single-institution experience.
Scaletta G; Quagliozzi L; Cianci S; Vargiu V; Mele MC; Scambia G; Fagotti A
Updates Surg; 2019 Dec; 71(4):729-734. PubMed ID: 31006086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot Surgery Shows Similar Long-term Oncologic Outcomes as Laparoscopic Surgery for Mid/Lower Rectal Cancer but Is Beneficial to ypT3/4 After Preoperative Chemoradiation.
Park SY; Lee SM; Park JS; Kim HJ; Choi GS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Jul; 64(7):812-821. PubMed ID: 33833141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Chylous ascites as a complication of laparoscopic nephrectomy.
Kim BS; Yoo ES; Kim TH; Kwon TG
J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):570-4. PubMed ID: 20639020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
