BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34955365)

  • 1. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
    Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
    Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
    Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
    Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts.
    Jia M; Lin X; Zhou X; Yan H; Chen Y; Liu P; Bao L; Li A; Basu P; Qiao Y; Sankaranarayanan R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 32338323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery.
    Depretto C; Liguori A; Primolevo A; Di Cosimo S; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
    Tumori; 2021 Apr; 107(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 32552398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dependability of Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) in Assessing Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category and Size of Malignant Breast Lesions Compared with Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) and Mammography (MG).
    Chen H; Han M; Jing H; Liu Z; Shang H; Wang Q; Cheng W
    Int J Gen Med; 2021; 14():9193-9202. PubMed ID: 34880658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
    Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
    Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The diagnostic performance of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound and mammography in symptomatic outpatient women: a multicenter, cross-sectional study in China.
    Lin X; Jia M; Zhou X; Bao L; Chen Y; Liu P; Feng R; Zhang X; Zhu L; Wang H; Zhu Y; Tang G; Feng W; Li A; Qiao Y
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):947-957. PubMed ID: 32852589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses.
    Yun G; Kim SM; Yun B; Ahn HS; Jang M
    Ultrasonography; 2019 Jul; 38(3):264-271. PubMed ID: 30999717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Potential of Adding Mammography to Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in BI-RADS Ultrasound Category 4a: A Multicenter Hospital-Based Study in China.
    Ren W; Zhao X; Zhao X; Yan H; Hu S; Qiao Y; Xu Z; Zhao F
    Curr Oncol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):3301-3314. PubMed ID: 36975464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A multicenter hospital-based diagnosis study of automated breast ultrasound system in detecting breast cancer among Chinese women.
    Zhang X; Lin X; Tan Y; Zhu Y; Wang H; Feng R; Tang G; Zhou X; Li A; Qiao Y
    Chin J Cancer Res; 2018 Apr; 30(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 29861608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps.
    Ibraheem SA; Mahmud R; Mohamad Saini S; Abu Hassan H; Keiteb AS
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integration of Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound among Women with Negative Mammographic Screening Findings: A Multi-center Population-based Study in China.
    Ren W; Yan H; Zhao X; Jia M; Zhang S; Zhang J; Li Z; Ming L; Zhang Y; Li H; He L; Li X; Cheng X; Yue L; Zhou W; Qiao Y; Zhao F
    Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30 Suppl 2():S114-S126. PubMed ID: 37003874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of supplemental three-dimensional breast ultrasound in the work-up of BI-RADS 0 screening recalls.
    den Dekker BM; Broeders MJM; Meeuwis C; Setz-Pels W; Venmans A; van Gils CH; Pijnappel RM
    Insights Imaging; 2024 May; 15(1):131. PubMed ID: 38816526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Automated Breast Ultrasound and Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound in the Screening of Dense Breasts.
    Philadelpho F; Calas MJG; Carneiro GAC; Silveira IC; Vaz ABR; Nogueira AMC; Bergmann A; Lopes FPPL
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2021 Mar; 43(3):190-199. PubMed ID: 33860502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of Automated Breast Ultrasonography and Handheld Ultrasonography for Breast Lesion Size Measurement.
    Park KW; Ko EY; Park S; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Kwon MR
    Ultrasound Q; 2022 Jan; 38(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 35001027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison and risk factors analysis of multiple breast cancer screening methods in the evaluation of breast non-mass-like lesions.
    Zhang J; Cai L; Pan X; Chen L; Chen M; Yan D; Liu J; Luo L
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Nov; 22(1):202. PubMed ID: 36404330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of automated versus hand-held breast US in supplemental screening in asymptomatic women with dense breasts: is there a difference regarding woman preference, lesion detection and lesion characterization?
    Tutar B; Esen Icten G; Guldogan N; Kara H; Arıkan AE; Tutar O; Uras C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1257-1265. PubMed ID: 32215718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.