These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34956991)

  • 1. Ethical Development of Artificial Amniotic Sac and Placenta Technology: A Roadmap.
    Verweij EJ; De Proost L; van Laar JOEH; Frank L; Obermann-Borstn SA; Vermeulen MJ; van Baalen S; van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; Kingma E
    Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():793308. PubMed ID: 34956991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical, Translational, and Legal Issues Surrounding the Novel Adoption of Ectogestative Technologies.
    Segers S; Romanis EC
    Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2022; 15():2207-2220. PubMed ID: 36451704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ectogestation ethics: The implications of artificially extending gestation for viability, newborn resuscitation and abortion.
    Di Stefano L; Mills C; Watkins A; Wilkinson D
    Bioethics; 2020 May; 34(4):371-384. PubMed ID: 31697404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interprofessional Consensus Regarding Design Requirements for Liquid-Based Perinatal Life Support (PLS) Technology.
    van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; Verweij EJT; Andriessen P; de Boode WP; Bos AF; Delbressine FLM; Eggink AJ; Erwich JJHM; Feijs LMG; Groenendaal F; Kramer BWW; Lely AT; Loop RFAM; Neukamp F; Onland W; Oudijk MA; Te Pas AB; Reiss IKM; Schoberer M; Scholten RR; Spaanderman MEA; van der Ven M; Vermeulen MJ; van de Vosse FN; Oei SG
    Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():793531. PubMed ID: 35127593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neonatal incubator or artificial womb? Distinguishing ectogestation and ectogenesis using the metaphysics of pregnancy.
    Kingma E; Finn S
    Bioethics; 2020 May; 34(4):354-363. PubMed ID: 32249443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.
    Salerno J; Coleman KJ; Jones F; Peters ES
    Ann Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 59():37-43. PubMed ID: 33894383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?
    Romanis EC
    Bioethics; 2020 May; 34(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 31782820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethics Considerations Regarding Artificial Womb Technology for the Fetonate.
    De Bie FR; Kim SD; Bose SK; Nathanson P; Partridge EA; Flake AW; Feudtner C
    Am J Bioeth; 2023 May; 23(5):67-78. PubMed ID: 35362359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders.
    Wangmo T; Lipps M; Kressig RW; Ienca M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 31856798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbicide research in developing countries: have we given the ethical concerns due consideration?
    Moodley K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2007 Sep; 8():10. PubMed ID: 17877834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical considerations in the use of artificial womb/placenta technology.
    Werner KM; Mercurio MR
    Semin Perinatol; 2022 Apr; 46(3):151521. PubMed ID: 34893338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Ethical Framework for the Design, Development, Implementation, and Assessment of Drones Used in Public Healthcare.
    Cawthorne D; Robbins-van Wynsberghe A
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Oct; 26(5):2867-2891. PubMed ID: 32578062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do patients and research subjects have a right to receive their genomic raw data? An ethical and legal analysis.
    Schickhardt C; Fleischer H; Winkler EC
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 31948449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.
    Fischer F; Lewith G; Witt CM; Linde K; von Ammon K; Cardini F; Falkenberg T; Fønnebø V; Johannessen H; Reiter B; Uehleke B; Weidenhammer W; Brinkhaus B
    Forsch Komplementmed; 2014; 21(2):e1-16. PubMed ID: 24851850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: time to develop ethically conscious standards.
    Pandya-Wood R; Barron DS; Elliott J
    Res Involv Engagem; 2017; 3():6. PubMed ID: 29062531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Moving forwards: A problem for full ectogenesis.
    Baron T
    Bioethics; 2021 Jun; 35(5):407-413. PubMed ID: 33587328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.