123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34957499)
1. The Influence of Storage in Saline or Irradiation by Ultraviolet on Surface Hydrophilicity of Implant and Osseointegration: An Experimental Study in Rabbits.
Zhu Y; Xu A; Zhou C; Wu Y; Lin G; He F
J Oral Implantol; 2023 Feb; 49(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 34957499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The In Vivo Bone Response of Ultraviolet-Irradiated Titanium Implants Modified with Spontaneously Formed Nanostructures: An Experimental Study in Rabbits.
Shen J; Liu J; Chen X; Wang X; He F; Wang H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):776-84. PubMed ID: 27447142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of ultraviolet-C irradiation via a bactericidal ultraviolet sterilizer on an anodized titanium implant: a study in rabbits.
Park KH; Koak JY; Kim SK; Han CH; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23377048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kwon TG; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones.
El Chaar E; Zhang L; Zhou Y; Sandgren R; Fricain JC; Dard M; Pippenger B; Catros S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):443–450. PubMed ID: 30703182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
Lee JT; Cho SA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of hydrophilicity and fluoride surface modifications to titanium dental implants on early osseointegration: an in vivo study.
Hong YS; Kim MJ; Han JS; Yeo IS
Implant Dent; 2014 Oct; 23(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 25192155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Control Variable Implants Improve Interpretation of Surface Modification and Implant Design Effects on Early Bone Responses: An In Vivo Study.
Choi JY; Kang SH; Kim HY; Yeo IL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1033-1040. PubMed ID: 30231089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photo-activated implants: a triple-blinded, split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial on the resistance to removal torque at various healing intervals.
Puisys A; Schlee M; Linkevicius T; Petrakakis P; Tjaden A
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 May; 24(5):1789-1799. PubMed ID: 31512072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early bone apposition to hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium implant surfaces: a histologic and histomorphometric study in minipigs.
Vasak C; Busenlechner D; Schwarze UY; Leitner HF; Munoz Guzon F; Hefti T; Schlottig F; Gruber R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1378-85. PubMed ID: 24118429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Influence of Nanostructured Hydroxyapatite Surface in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: A Multiparameter Animal Study in Low-Density Bone.
Sartoretto SC; Calasans-Maia J; Resende R; Câmara E; Ghiraldini B; Barbosa Bezerra FJ; Granjeiro JM; Calasans-Maia MD
Int J Nanomedicine; 2020; 15():8803-8817. PubMed ID: 33204089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydrophilic implants generated using a low-cost dielectric barrier discharge plasma device at the time of placement exhibit increased osseointegration in an animal pre-clinical study: An effect that is sex-dependent.
Berger MB; Cohen DJ; Levit MM; Puetzer JL; Boyan BD; Schwartz Z
Dent Mater; 2022 Apr; 38(4):632-645. PubMed ID: 35184898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nanostructures and hydrophilicity influence osseointegration: a biomechanical study in the rabbit tibia.
Wennerberg A; Jimbo R; Stübinger S; Obrecht M; Dard M; Berner S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1041-50. PubMed ID: 23782316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW; An CH; Jeong SH; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21435010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of a Hydrophilic Dental Implant Surface on Osseointegration: Biomechanical Results in Rabbit.
Jinno Y; Stocchero M; Galli S; Toia M; Becktor JP
J Oral Implantol; 2021 Apr; 47(2):163-168. PubMed ID: 32663272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stimulation of directed bone growth at oxidized titanium implants by macroscopic grooves: an in vivo study.
Hall J; Miranda-Burgos P; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7 Suppl 1():S76-82. PubMed ID: 16137091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
