185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34957528)
1. Staging
Kesler M; Kerzhner K; Druckmann I; Kuten J; Levine C; Sarid D; Keizman D; Yossepowitch O; Even-Sapir E
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 May; 49(6):2077-2085. PubMed ID: 34957528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone scintigraphy as a gatekeeper for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: comparison with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT.
Caglar M; Tuncel M; Yildiz E; Karabulut E
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Dec; 34(12):932-941. PubMed ID: 32975741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total-Body
Pomykala KL; Czernin J; Grogan TR; Armstrong WR; Williams J; Calais J
J Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 61(3):405-411. PubMed ID: 31541035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective intra-individual comparison of [
Lawal IO; Mokoala KMG; Mahapane J; Kleyhans J; Meckel M; Vorster M; Ebenhan T; Rösch F; Sathekge MM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jan; 48(1):134-142. PubMed ID: 32424485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of bone metastases detected on
Önner H; Yılmaz F
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 35503556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of metastatic disease on
Yaxley JW; Raveenthiran S; Nouhaud FX; Samaratunga H; Yaxley WJ; Coughlin G; Yaxley AJ; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D
BJU Int; 2019 Sep; 124(3):401-407. PubMed ID: 31141284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is there a utility of adding skeletal imaging to 68-Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-PET/computed tomography in initial staging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer?
Raju S; Sharma A; Patel C; Sahoo R; Das CJ; Kumar S; Sharma A; Kumar R
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Nov; 41(11):1183-1188. PubMed ID: 32796451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ga-PSMA PET/CT Staging of Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Kuten J; Mabjeesh NJ; Lerman H; Levine C; Barnes S; Even-Sapir E
Isr Med Assoc J; 2019 Feb; 21(2):100-104. PubMed ID: 30772960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
Lengana T; Lawal IO; Boshomane TG; Popoola GO; Mokoala KMG; Moshokoa E; Maes A; Mokgoro NP; Van de Wiele C; Vorster M; Sathekge MM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Oct; 16(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 30120038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT derived quantitative volumetric tumor parameters for classification and evaluation of therapeutic response of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients.
Schmidkonz C; Cordes M; Goetz TI; Prante O; Kuwert T; Ritt P; Uder M; Wullich B; Goebell P; Bäuerle T
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Oct; 33(10):766-775. PubMed ID: 31338731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [
Janssen JC; Woythal N; Meißner S; Prasad V; Brenner W; Diederichs G; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Dec; 19(6):933-943. PubMed ID: 28707038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extent of disease in recurrent prostate cancer determined by [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT in relation to PSA levels, PSA doubling time and Gleason score.
Verburg FA; Pfister D; Heidenreich A; Vogg A; Drude NI; Vöö S; Mottaghy FM; Behrendt FF
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 26563121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical consequences of routine
Zacho HD; Nalliah S; Petersen A; Petersen LJ
Scand J Urol; 2022; 56(5-6):353-358. PubMed ID: 36073096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationships between serum PSA levels, Gleason scores and results of 68Ga-PSMAPET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer.
Sanli Y; Kuyumcu S; Sanli O; Buyukkaya F; İribaş A; Alcin G; Darendeliler E; Ozluk Y; Yildiz SO; Turkmen C
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):709-717. PubMed ID: 28900854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of
Schwenck J; Rempp H; Reischl G; Kruck S; Stenzl A; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C; la Fougère C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 27557844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of [
Uprimny C; Svirydenka A; Fritz J; Kroiss AS; Nilica B; Decristoforo C; Haubner R; von Guggenberg E; Buxbaum S; Horninger W; Virgolini IJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Oct; 45(11):1873-1883. PubMed ID: 29766246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Head-To-Head Comparison of
Zhao G; Ji B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):386-395. PubMed ID: 35441529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
