BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34957730)

  • 1. Cervix-Online computer program: 27 years of hospital-based clinical registry for cervical cancer at the University Medical Centre Maribor.
    Lovrec VG; Arko D; Takac I
    Radiol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 56(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 34957730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inquiry and computer program Onko-Online: 25 years of clinical registry for breast cancer at the University Medical Centre Maribor.
    Arko D; Takac I
    Radiol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 53(3):348-356. PubMed ID: 31553707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
    Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of women with high grade histopathology results after conisation by artificial neural networks.
    Mlinaric M; Krizmaric M; Takac I; Repse Fokter A
    Radiol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 56(3):355-364. PubMed ID: 35776841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low proportion of unreported cervical treatments in the cancer registry of Norway between 1998 and 2013.
    Leinonen MK; Hansen SA; Skare GB; Skaaret IB; Silva M; Johannesen TB; Nygård M
    Acta Oncol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):1663-1670. PubMed ID: 30169991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis of physiologic and abnormal pictures of uterine cervix by means of infrared thermography].
    Smaga A; Paszkowski T; Woźniak S; Walczak R
    Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):847-54. PubMed ID: 14674135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Carcinoma of the cervical stump--multicenter study].
    Rechberger T; Perzyło K; Miotła P; Nowak-Markwitz E; Zaborowski M; Lemańska A; Baranowski W; Nowakowski A; Reinholz-Jaskólska M; Sawicki W
    Ginekol Pol; 2014 Jun; 85(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 25029808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing performance of a hospital-based cancer registry: Hacettepe University hospitals experience.
    Kutluk T; Mutlu Hayran K; Kilickap S; Yuce D; Celik I; Erman M; Yalcin S
    J BUON; 2013; 18(4):1088-96. PubMed ID: 24344044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival of gynecological cancers in Turkey: where are we at?
    Gultekin M; Dundar S; Kucukyildiz I; Karaca MZ; Boztas G; Turan SH; Hacikamiloglu E; Keskinkilic B
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e85. PubMed ID: 29027403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry.
    Gage JC; Joste N; Ronnett BM; Stoler M; Hunt WC; Schiffman M; Wheeler CM
    Hum Pathol; 2013 Nov; 44(11):2542-8. PubMed ID: 24075599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association between developmental steps in the organogenesis of the uterine cervix and locoregional progression of cervical cancer: a prospective clinicopathological analysis.
    Höckel M; Hentschel B; Horn LC
    Lancet Oncol; 2014 Apr; 15(4):445-56. PubMed ID: 24656439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
    Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple neoplasms among cervical cancer patients in the material of the lower Silesian cancer registry.
    Izmajłowicz B; Kornafel J; Błaszczyk J
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2014; 23(3):433-40. PubMed ID: 24979516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival of Node-negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated at the University Medical Centre Maribor in the Period 2000-2009.
    Fokter Dovnik N; Arko D; Čas Sikošek N; Takač I
    Zdr Varst; 2017 Sep; 56(3):185-192. PubMed ID: 28713448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The road to cervical cancer elimination in Malaysia: Evaluation of the impact and cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus screening with self-collection and digital registry support.
    Keane A; Ng CW; Simms KT; Nguyen D; Woo YL; Saville M; Canfell K
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Dec; 149(12):1997-2009. PubMed ID: 34363620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
    Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
    Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National registry of cervical cytologic diagnoses in The Netherlands.
    Vooijs GP; Casparie-van Velsen IA; Peters FA; Beck HL
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):825-30. PubMed ID: 2588915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.
    Hijjeh M; Al Shaikh L; Alinier G; Selwood D; Malmstrom F; Hassan IF
    Qatar Med J; 2019; 2019(2):2. PubMed ID: 31763205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Society of Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Outcomes Registry: From small beginnings come great things.
    Dewdney SB; Dancisak AC; Lachance JA; Grendys EC; Dowdy SC; Powell M; Schorge JO
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):439-444. PubMed ID: 29395312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using clinical cancer registry data for estimation of quality indicators: Results from the Norwegian breast cancer registry.
    Hartmann-Johnsen OJ; Kåresen R; Schlichting E; Naume B; Nygård JF
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 May; 125():102-109. PubMed ID: 30914174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.