These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34957790)

  • 21. Aortic regurgitation assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography: intermodality disagreement impacting on prediction of post-surgical left ventricular remodeling.
    Neisius U; Tsao CW; Hauser TH; Patel AD; Pierce P; Ben-Assa E; Nezafat R; Manning WJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 36(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 31414256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of left ventricular volumes and primary mitral regurgitation severity by 2D echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Van De Heyning CM; Magne J; Piérard LA; Bruyère PJ; Davin L; De Maeyer C; Paelinck BP; Vrints CJ; Lancellotti P
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2013 Dec; 11():46. PubMed ID: 24373138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mapping of mitral regurgitant defects by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in moderate or severe mitral regurgitation secondary to mitral valve prolapse.
    Gabriel RS; Kerr AJ; Raffel OC; Stewart RA; Cowan BR; Occleshaw CJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2008 Apr; 10(1):16. PubMed ID: 18400088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preoperative scallop-by-scallop assessment of mitral prolapse using 2D-transthoracic echocardiography.
    Minardi G; Pino PG; Manzara CC; Pulignano G; Stefanini GG; Viceconte GN; Leonetti S; Madeo A; Gaudio C; Musumeci F
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2010 Jan; 8():1. PubMed ID: 20044927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitation of mitral regurgitation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review.
    Krieger EV; Lee J; Branch KR; Hamilton-Craig C
    Heart; 2016 Dec; 102(23):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 27733535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of the severity of native mitral valve regurgitation.
    El-Tallawi KC; Messika-Zeitoun D; Zoghbi WA
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2017; 60(3):322-333. PubMed ID: 29174559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimizing correlation with Doppler echocardiography.
    Gelfand EV; Hughes S; Hauser TH; Yeon SB; Goepfert L; Kissinger KV; Rofsky NM; Manning WJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2006; 8(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 16755839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characterization of Primary Mitral Regurgitation With Flail Leaflet and/or Wall-Impinging Flow.
    Uretsky S; Morales DCV; Aldaia L; Mediratta A; Koulogiannis K; Marcoff L; Sakul S; Wolff SD; Gillam LD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 78(25):2537-2546. PubMed ID: 34915984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative Evaluation of Mitral Regurgitation Secondary to Mitral Valve Prolapse by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography.
    Le Goffic C; Toledano M; Ennezat PV; Binda C; Castel AL; Delelis F; Graux P; Tribouilloy C; Maréchaux S
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Nov; 116(9):1405-10. PubMed ID: 26372213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Routine cine-CMR for prosthesis-associated mitral regurgitation: a multicenter comparison to echocardiography.
    Simprini LA; Afroz A; Cooper MA; Klem I; Jensen C; Kim RJ; Srichai MB; Heitner JF; Sood M; Chandy E; Shah DJ; Lopez-Mattei J; Biederman RW; Grizzard JD; Fuisz A; Ghafourian K; Farzaneh-Far A; Weinsaft J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):575-82. PubMed ID: 25799706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Functional assessment of mitral regurgitation by transthoracic echocardiography using standardized imaging planes diagnostic accuracy and outcome implications.
    Monin JL; Dehant P; Roiron C; Monchi M; Tabet JY; Clerc P; Fernandez G; Houel R; Garot J; Chauvel C; Gueret P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 46(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 16022959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantification of regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse with automated real time echocardiographic 3D proximal isovelocity surface area: multimodality consistency and role of eccentricity index.
    Spampinato RA; Lindemann F; Jahnke C; Paetsch I; Fahr F; Sieg F; von Roeder M; Noack T; Hilbert S; Löbe S; Strotdrees E; Hindricks G; Borger MA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jun; 37(6):1947-1959. PubMed ID: 33616785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Usefulness of transthoracic echocardiography in detecting significant prosthetic mitral valve regurgitation.
    Olmos L; Salazar G; Barbetseas J; Quiñones MA; Zoghbi WA
    Am J Cardiol; 1999 Jan; 83(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 10073821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of the accuracy of common clinical thresholds for cardiac morphology and function by transthoracic echocardiography.
    Alexis JA; Costello B; Iles LM; Ellims AH; Hare JL; Taylor AJ
    J Echocardiogr; 2017 Mar; 15(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 27817093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of three-dimensional proximal isovelocity surface area to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for quantifying mitral regurgitation.
    Brugger N; Wustmann K; Hürzeler M; Wahl A; de Marchi SF; Steck H; Zürcher F; Seiler C
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 115(8):1130-6. PubMed ID: 25747111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Grading of aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and pulsed Doppler of the left subclavian artery: harmonizing grading scales between imaging modalities.
    Spampinato RA; Jahnke C; Paetsch I; Hilbert S; Löbe S; Lindemann F; Strotdrees E; Hindricks G; Borger MA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1517-1526. PubMed ID: 32306157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Value of CMR in quantification of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after TAVI.
    Salaun E; Jacquier A; Theron A; Giorgi R; Lambert M; Jaussaud N; Hubert S; Collart F; Bonnet JL; Habib G; Cuisset T; Grisoli D
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 26188194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Effect of Systolic Variation of Mitral Regurgitation on Discordance Between Noninvasive Imaging Modalities.
    Uretsky S; Aldaia L; Marcoff L; Koulogiannis K; Hiramatsu S; Argulian E; Rosenthal M; Gillam LD; Wolff SD
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Dec; 12(12):2431-2442. PubMed ID: 31005539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.
    Jabbour A; Ismail TF; Moat N; Gulati A; Roussin I; Alpendurada F; Park B; Okoroafor F; Asgar A; Barker S; Davies S; Prasad SK; Rubens M; Mohiaddin RH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproducibility of reading echocardiographic parameters to assess severity of mitral regurgitation. Insights from a French multicentre study.
    Coisne A; Aghezzaf S; Edmé JL; Bernard A; Ma I; Bohbot Y; Di Lena C; Nicol M; Lavie Badie Y; Eyharts D; Seemann A; Falaise C; Ternacle J; Nguyen A; Montier G; Hubert A; Montaigne D; Donal E; Dreyfus J
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Oct; 113(10):599-606. PubMed ID: 32994143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.