109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34958059)
1. Immunohistochemical expression of the ERG gene in prostatic adenocarcinoma and its relationship with clinicopathological parameters.
Birol IE; Bahadir B; Ozdamar SO; Kaymaz E; Girgin R
Malays J Pathol; 2021 Dec; 43(3):381-388. PubMed ID: 34958059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immunohistochemical expression of Ets-related gene-transcriptional factor in adenocarcinoma prostate and its correlation with Gleason score.
Mannan R; Bhasin TS; Manjari M; Singh G; Bhatia PK; Sharma S
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2016; 59(4):489-495. PubMed ID: 27721279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cross-sectional study of ERG expression and the relationship with clinicopathological features of Prostate cancer in Southwestern Uganda.
Mitala Y; Ssenkumba B; Birungi A; Kiconco R; Mutakooha MM; Atwine R
Diagn Pathol; 2024 May; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 38730435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FOXA1 expression is a strong independent predictor of early PSA recurrence in ERG negative prostate cancers treated by radical prostatectomy.
Tsourlakis MC; Eleftheriadou A; Stender A; Weigand P; Grupp K; Hube-Magg C; Kluth M; Schroeder C; Steurer S; Hinsch A; Luebke A; Angerer A; Wittmer C; Friedrich E; Göbel C; Büscheck F; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Simon R; Sauter G; Wilczak W; Minner S; Schlomm T; Jacobsen F
Carcinogenesis; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1180-1187. PubMed ID: 29029032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expression of ERG oncoprotein is associated with a less aggressive tumor phenotype in Japanese prostate cancer patients.
Kimura T; Furusato B; Miki J; Yamamoto T; Hayashi N; Takahashi H; Kamata Y; van Leenders GJ; Visakorpi T; Egawa S
Pathol Int; 2012 Nov; 62(11):742-8. PubMed ID: 23121605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The expression profile and heterogeneity analysis of ERG in 633 consecutive prostate cancers from a single center.
Nie L; Pan X; Zhang M; Yin X; Gong J; Chen X; Xu M; Zhou Q; Chen N
Prostate; 2019 Jun; 79(8):819-825. PubMed ID: 30900303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Foamy gland carcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy: incidence, Gleason grade, and comparative α-methylacyl-CoA racemase vs. ERG expression.
Warrick JI; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Nov; 37(11):1709-14. PubMed ID: 23797726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relevance of ERG immunoexpression intensity for prostatic adenocarcinoma in radical prostatectomy of 635 samples.
Feitosa PMFA; Hirth CG; Silva-Fernandes IJL; Dornelas CA
APMIS; 2023 Sep; 131(9):465-471. PubMed ID: 37439391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Weaker ERG expression in patients with ERG-positive prostate cancer is associated with advanced disease and weaker androgen receptor expression: An Indian outlook.
Suryavanshi M; Mehta A; Jaipuria J; Sharma AK; Rawal S; Seth N
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):331.e9-15. PubMed ID: 25899828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of ERG expression and DNA methylation biomarkers with adverse clinicopathologic features of prostate cancer.
Kron K; Liu L; Trudel D; Pethe V; Trachtenberg J; Fleshner N; Bapat B; van der Kwast T
Clin Cancer Res; 2012 May; 18(10):2896-904. PubMed ID: 22452941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between the preoperative serum prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, and clinical staging with pathological outcome following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Indian experience.
Singh P; Dogra PN; Gupta NP; Nayyar R; Seth A; Javali TD; Kumar R
Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(4):483-7. PubMed ID: 22293265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The expression profile and prognostic value of SPINK1 in initially diagnosed bone metastatic prostate cancer.
Pan X; Zhang X; Gong J; Tan J; Yin X; Tang Q; Shu K; Shen P; Zeng H; Chen N
Prostate; 2016 Jun; 76(9):823-33. PubMed ID: 27159572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. KPNA2/ERG Coexpression is Associated With Early Recurrence in Advanced Prostate Cancers.
D'Antonio A; Caputo A; Fraggetta F; Pepe P; Insabato L; Barra E; Barresi V; Altieri V; Greco U; Savastano R; Zeppa P
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2020 Jan; 28(1):62-66. PubMed ID: 31809312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of pathologic revision and Ki67 and ERG immunohistochemistry on predicting radical prostatectomy outcome in men initially on active surveillance.
Bokhorst LP; Roobol MJ; Bangma CH; van Leenders GJ
Prostate; 2017 Jul; 77(10):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 28543353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of microvessel density in predicting recurrence in pathologic Stage T3 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Gettman MT; Pacelli A; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute M; Zincke H; Bostwick DG
Urology; 1999 Sep; 54(3):479-85. PubMed ID: 10475358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ERG expression is associated with increased risk of biochemical relapse following radical prostatectomy in early onset prostate cancer.
Huang KC; Dolph M; Donnelly B; Bismar TA
Clin Transl Oncol; 2014 Nov; 16(11):973-9. PubMed ID: 24796295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency of ERG-positive prostate carcinoma in Polands.
Kaczmarczyk K; Dyduch G; Białas M; Demczuk S; Szopiński T; Chłosta P; Okoń K
Pol J Pathol; 2013 Oct; 64(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 24166602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]