These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34958645)

  • 1. Do Words Matter? A Linguistic Analysis of Letters of Recommendation for Residency.
    Ranti DL; Liu H; Wasserburg JR; Rutland JW; Katz A; Zoghbi Y; Sayegh F; Taub PJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Feb; 149(2):366e-368e. PubMed ID: 34958645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do gender and racial differences exist in letters of recommendation for obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants?
    Brown O; Mou T; Lim SI; Jones S; Sade S; Kwasny MJ; Mueller MG; Kenton K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):554.e1-554.e11. PubMed ID: 34506753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender and Letters of Recommendation: A Linguistic Comparison of the Impact of Gender on General Surgery Residency Applicants
    French JC; Zolin SJ; Lampert E; Aiello A; Bencsath KP; Ritter KA; Strong AT; Lipman JM; Valente MA; Prabhu AS
    J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(4):899-905. PubMed ID: 30598383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are There Gender-based Differences in Language in Letters of Recommendation to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Program?
    Kobayashi AN; Sterling RS; Tackett SA; Chee BW; Laporte DM; Humbyrd CJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):1400-1408. PubMed ID: 31794493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Academic dermatologists' views on the value of residency letters of recommendation.
    Kaffenberger BH; Kaffenberger JA; Zirwas MJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Aug; 71(2):395-6. PubMed ID: 25037791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender-based differences in letters of recommendation written for ophthalmology residency applicants.
    Lin F; Oh SK; Gordon LK; Pineles SL; Rosenberg JB; Tsui I
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 19(1):476. PubMed ID: 31888607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Letters of Recommendation: Wave the Waiving Away!
    Agrawal H
    Acad Med; 2021 May; 96(5):615. PubMed ID: 33885406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Don't Judge a Letter by its Title: Linguistic Analysis of Letters of Recommendation by Author's Academic Rank.
    Han AY; French JC; Tu C; Obiri-Yeboah D; Lipman JM; Prabhu AS
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(6):e19-e27. PubMed ID: 34011478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Letters of Recommendation.
    Bourque SL; Lee CJ; Jones MD; Sullivan GM
    J Grad Med Educ; 2019 Aug; 11(4):479-480. PubMed ID: 31440346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linguistic Analysis of Letters of Recommendation for Vascular Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology Applicants Detects Differences in Attributable Strengths Based on Gender.
    Go C; Lang S; Byrne M; Brucha DL; Parviainen K; Sachdev U
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(5):1535-1543. PubMed ID: 33745859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Are There Gender-based Differences in Language in Letters of Recommendation to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Program?
    Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):1396-1399. PubMed ID: 32452926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plagiarised letters of recommendation submitted for the National Resident Matching Program.
    Maruca-Sullivan PE; Lane CE; Moore EZ; Ross DA
    Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 52(6):632-640. PubMed ID: 29508419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linguistic Differences by Gender in Letters of Recommendation for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Fellowship Applicants.
    Tappy E; Pan E; Verma D; Wang A; Brown LS; Chang S; Florian-Rodriguez M
    J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(4):928-934. PubMed ID: 35249843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability in evaluating letters of recommendation.
    Dirschl DR; Adams GL
    Acad Med; 2000 Oct; 75(10):1029. PubMed ID: 11031153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linguistic Biases in Letters of Recommendation for Radiation Oncology Residency Applicants from 2015 to 2019.
    Chapman BV; Rooney MK; Ludmir EB; De La Cruz D; Salcedo A; Pinnix CC; Das P; Jagsi R; Thomas CR; Holliday EB
    J Cancer Educ; 2022 Aug; 37(4):965-972. PubMed ID: 33111188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Letters of recommendation for pediatric surgery fellowship: Analysis of linguistic differences based on gender of the applicant.
    Bludevich B; Irby I; Chang H; Danielson PD; Gonzalez R; Snyder CW; Chandler NM
    J Pediatr Surg; 2021 Aug; 56(8):1299-1304. PubMed ID: 33785201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Gender on Surgical Residency Applicants' Recommendation Letters.
    Turrentine FE; Dreisbach CN; St Ivany AR; Hanks JB; Schroen AT
    J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Apr; 228(4):356-365.e3. PubMed ID: 30630084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letters of recommendation for surgical residencies: what they say and what they mean.
    Greenburg AG; Doyle J; McClure DK
    J Surg Res; 1994 Feb; 56(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 8121177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. March madness.
    Chansky ME
    J Emerg Med; 1997; 15(1):107-8. PubMed ID: 9081986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Letters of recommendation: Nuanced bias or useful affirmation?
    Go C; Sachdev U
    J Vasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 74(2S):29S-32S. PubMed ID: 34303456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.