These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34958674)
1. AMDBNorm: an approach based on distribution adjustment to eliminate batch effects of gene expression data. Zhang X; Ye Z; Chen J; Qiao F Brief Bioinform; 2022 Jan; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 34958674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Removing Batch Effects from Longitudinal Gene Expression - Quantile Normalization Plus ComBat as Best Approach for Microarray Transcriptome Data. Müller C; Schillert A; Röthemeier C; Trégouët DA; Proust C; Binder H; Pfeiffer N; Beutel M; Lackner KJ; Schnabel RB; Tiret L; Wild PS; Blankenberg S; Zeller T; Ziegler A PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156594. PubMed ID: 27272489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blind estimation and correction of microarray batch effect. Varma S PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231446. PubMed ID: 32271844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Batch correction of microarray data substantially improves the identification of genes differentially expressed in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Kupfer P; Guthke R; Pohlers D; Huber R; Koczan D; Kinne RW BMC Med Genomics; 2012 Jun; 5():23. PubMed ID: 22682473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Overcoming the impacts of two-step batch effect correction on gene expression estimation and inference. Li T; Zhang Y; Patil P; Johnson WE Biostatistics; 2023 Jul; 24(3):635-652. PubMed ID: 34893807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction. Parker HS; Leek JT; Favorov AV; Considine M; Xia X; Chavan S; Chung CH; Fertig EJ Bioinformatics; 2014 Oct; 30(19):2757-63. PubMed ID: 24907368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Batch effect detection and correction in RNA-seq data using machine-learning-based automated assessment of quality. Sprang M; Andrade-Navarro MA; Fontaine JF BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jul; 23(Suppl 6):279. PubMed ID: 35836114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Covariance adjustment for batch effect in gene expression data. Lee JA; Dobbin KK; Ahn J Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(15):2681-95. PubMed ID: 24687561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Batch adjustment by reference alignment (BARA): Improved prediction performance in biological test sets with batch effects. Gradin R; Lindstedt M; Johansson H PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212669. PubMed ID: 30794641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Zhang Y; Parmigiani G; Johnson WE NAR Genom Bioinform; 2020 Sep; 2(3):lqaa078. PubMed ID: 33015620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Batch correction of single-cell sequencing data via an autoencoder architecture. Danino R; Nachman I; Sharan R Bioinform Adv; 2024; 4(1):vbad186. PubMed ID: 38213820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An algorithm for chemical genomic profiling that minimizes batch effects: bucket evaluations. Shabtai D; Giaever G; Nislow C BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():245. PubMed ID: 23009392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Batch effect correction for genome-wide methylation data with Illumina Infinium platform. Sun Z; Chai HS; Wu Y; White WM; Donkena KV; Klein CJ; Garovic VD; Therneau TM; Kocher JP BMC Med Genomics; 2011 Dec; 4():84. PubMed ID: 22171553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correcting for intra-experiment variation in Illumina BeadChip data is necessary to generate robust gene-expression profiles. Kitchen RR; Sabine VS; Sims AH; Macaskill EJ; Renshaw L; Thomas JS; van Hemert JI; Dixon JM; Bartlett JM BMC Genomics; 2010 Feb; 11():134. PubMed ID: 20181233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Batch correction evaluation framework using a-priori gene-gene associations: applied to the GTEx dataset. Somekh J; Shen-Orr SS; Kohane IS BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 20(1):268. PubMed ID: 31138121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Higher-order correction of persistent batch effects in correlation networks. Micheletti S; Schlauch D; Quackenbush J; Ben Guebila M Bioinformatics; 2024 Sep; 40(9):. PubMed ID: 39226186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. BatchFLEX: feature-level equalization of X-batch. Davis JT; Obermayer AN; Soupir AC; Hesterberg RS; Duong T; Yang CY; Dao KP; Manley BJ; Grass GD; Avram D; Rodriguez PC; Fridley BL; Yu X; Teng M; Wang X; Shaw TI Bioinformatics; 2024 Oct; 40(10):. PubMed ID: 39360977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. svaseq: removing batch effects and other unwanted noise from sequencing data. Leek JT Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Dec; 42(21):e161. PubMed ID: 25294822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Propensity scores as a novel method to guide sample allocation and minimize batch effects during the design of high throughput experiments. Carry PM; Vigers T; Vanderlinden LA; Keeter C; Dong F; Buckner T; Litkowski E; Yang I; Norris JM; Kechris K BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Mar; 24(1):86. PubMed ID: 36882691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protein complex-based analysis is resistant to the obfuscating consequences of batch effects --- a case study in clinical proteomics. Goh WW; Wong L BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 2):142. PubMed ID: 28361693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]