These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34962591)

  • 41. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.
    Sharma AK; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Mohsin M
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and full threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Aoki Y; Takahashi G; Kitahara K
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 17415692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of 24-2 Faster, Fast, and Standard Programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for Perimetry in Patients With Manifest and Suspect Glaucoma.
    Thulasidas M; Patyal S
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 32890104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of two Humphrey perimetry programs: full threshold and SITA standard testing strategy for learning effect.
    Yenice O; Temel A
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 15812761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. 24-2 SITA Standard versus 24-2 SITA Faster in Perimetry-Naive Normal Subjects.
    Costa VP; Zangalli CS; Jammal AA; Medeiros FA; Miyazaki JVMK; Perez V; Nardi Boscaroli ML; Schimiti RB
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 35985477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
    Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Retinal Sensitivity Thresholds Obtained Through Easyfield and Humphrey Perimeters in Eyes with Glaucoma: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.
    Nazareth T; Rocha J; Scoralick ALB; Dias DT; Gracitelli CPB; Kanadani FN; Prata TS
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():4201-4207. PubMed ID: 33299296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical evaluation of SITA: a new family of perimetric testing strategies.
    Shirato S; Inoue R; Fukushima K; Suzuki Y
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1999 Jan; 237(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 9951638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparing the usefulness of a new algorithm to measure visual field using the variational Bayes linear regression in glaucoma patients, in comparison to the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm.
    Murata H; Asaoka R; Fujino Y; Matsuura M; Hirasawa K; Shimada S; Shoji N
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 106(5):660-666. PubMed ID: 33441321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Patterns of glaucomatous visual field loss in sita fields automatically identified using independent component analysis.
    Goldbaum MH; Jang GJ; Bowd C; Hao J; Zangwill LM; Liebmann J; Girkin C; Jung TP; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2009 Dec; 107():136-44. PubMed ID: 20126490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma.
    Lavanya R; Riyazuddin M; Dasari S; Puttaiah NK; Venugopal JP; Pradhan ZS; Devi S; Sreenivasaiah S; Ganeshrao SB; Rao HL
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Sep; 29(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 32459685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Differences in visual field loss pattern when transitioning from SITA standard to SITA faster.
    Le CT; Fiksel J; Ramulu P; Yohannan J
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):7001. PubMed ID: 35488026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma.
    Thomas R; Bhat S; Muliyil JP; Parikh R; George R
    J Glaucoma; 2002 Feb; 11(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 11821689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sensitivity and Specificity of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm and Standard Full Threshold Perimetry in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma.
    Bamdad S; Beigi V; Sedaghat MR
    Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2017; 6(4):125-129. PubMed ID: 29560366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of the frequency doubling technology screening algorithm and the Humphrey 24-2 SITA-FAST in a large eye screening.
    Allen CS; Sponsel WE; Trigo Y; Dirks MS; Flynn WJ
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Feb; 30(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 11885802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Roggen X; Herman K; Van Malderen L; Devos M; Spileers W
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001; (279):23-33. PubMed ID: 11344712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.