140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34962889)
1. Robust PPG-Based Mental Workload Assessment System Using Wearable Devices.
Beh WK; Wu YH; Wu AY
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2023 May; 27(5):2323-2333. PubMed ID: 34962889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of HRV parameters derived from photoplethysmography and electrocardiography signals.
Jeyhani V; Mahdiani S; Peltokangas M; Vehkaoja A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():5952-5. PubMed ID: 26737647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of using different algorithms and fiducial points for the detection of interbeat intervals, and different sampling rates on the assessment of pulse rate variability from photoplethysmography.
Mejía-Mejía E; May JM; Kyriacou PA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 May; 218():106724. PubMed ID: 35255373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reference signal less Fourier analysis based motion artifact removal algorithm for wearable photoplethysmography devices to estimate heart rate during physical exercises.
Pankaj ; Kumar A; Komaragiri R; Kumar M
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Feb; 141():105081. PubMed ID: 34952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust Interbeat Interval and Heart Rate Variability Estimation Method From Various Morphological Features Using Wearable Sensors.
Aygun A; Ghasemzadeh H; Jafari R
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 Aug; 24(8):2238-2250. PubMed ID: 31899444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Novel Time-Varying Spectral Filtering Algorithm for Reconstruction of Motion Artifact Corrupted Heart Rate Signals During Intense Physical Activities Using a Wearable Photoplethysmogram Sensor.
Salehizadeh SM; Dao D; Bolkhovsky J; Cho C; Mendelson Y; Chon KH
Sensors (Basel); 2015 Dec; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 26703618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimized Signal Quality Assessment for Photoplethysmogram Signals Using Feature Selection.
Mohagheghian F; Han D; Peitzsch A; Nishita N; Ding E; Dickson EL; DiMezza D; Otabil EM; Noorishirazi K; Scott J; Lessard D; Wang Z; Whitcomb C; Tran KV; Fitzgibbons TP; McManus DD; Chon KH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Sep; 69(9):2982-2993. PubMed ID: 35275809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robust Beat-to-Beat Interval from Wearable PPG using RLS and SSA.
Bhattacharjee T; Choudhury AD; Pal A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():4946-4952. PubMed ID: 31946970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Information Retrieval from Photoplethysmographic Sensors: A Comprehensive Comparison of Practical Interpolation and Breath-Extraction Techniques at Different Sampling Rates.
Reali P; Lolatto R; Coelli S; Tartaglia G; Bianchi AM
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of heart rate variability signal features derived from electrocardiography and photoplethysmography in healthy individuals.
Bolanos M; Nazeran H; Haltiwanger E
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4289-94. PubMed ID: 17946618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A quality metric for heart rate variability from photoplethysmogram sensor data.
Zanon M; Kriara L; Lipsmeier F; Nobbs D; Chatham C; Hipp J; Lindemann M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():706-709. PubMed ID: 33018085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward Hypertension Prediction Based on PPG-Derived HRV Signals: a Feasibility Study.
Lan KC; Raknim P; Kao WF; Huang JH
J Med Syst; 2018 Apr; 42(6):103. PubMed ID: 29680866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Processing Photoplethysmograms Recorded by Smartwatches to Improve the Quality of Derived Pulse Rate Variability.
Polak AG; Klich B; Saganowski S; Prucnal MA; Kazienko P
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Heart Rate Variability from Wearables: A Comparative Analysis Among Standard ECG, a Smart Shirt and a Wristband.
Reali P; Tacchino G; Rocco G; Cerutti S; Bianchi AM
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 261():128-133. PubMed ID: 31156103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficient noise-tolerant estimation of heart rate variability using single-channel photoplethysmography.
Firoozabadi R; Helfenbein ED; Babaeizadeh S
J Electrocardiol; 2017; 50(6):841-846. PubMed ID: 28918214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can Wearable Devices Accurately Measure Heart Rate Variability? A Systematic Review.
Georgiou K; Larentzakis AV; Khamis NN; Alsuhaibani GI; Alaska YA; Giallafos EJ
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2018 Mar; 60(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 29668452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design of a Realtime Photoplethysmogram Signal Quality Checker for Wearables and Edge Computing.
Banerjee T; Gavas RD; Bs M; Karmakar S; Ramakrishnan RK; Pal A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():1323-1326. PubMed ID: 36086651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of error between the heartbeat intervals measured form photoplethysmogram and electrocardiogram by synchronisation.
Kuntamalla S; Lekkala RGR
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 Jul; 42(5):389-396. PubMed ID: 30324857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methodological considerations in calculating heart rate variability based on wearable device heart rate samples.
Chen HK; Hu YF; Lin SF
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Nov; 102():396-401. PubMed ID: 30177403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ear and Finger PPG Wearables for Night and Day Beat-to-Beat Interval Detection.
Haddad S; Boukhayma A; Caizzone A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():1686-1689. PubMed ID: 34891610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
