BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34963034)

  • 1. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: Prospective, multicenter, cohort trial.
    Kobayashi N; Takeuchi Y; Ohata K; Igarashi M; Yamada M; Kodashima S; Hotta K; Harada K; Ikematsu H; Uraoka T; Sakamoto N; Doyama H; Abe T; Katagiri A; Hori S; Michida T; Yamaguchi T; Fukuzawa M; Kiriyama S; Fukase K; Murakami Y; Ishikawa H; Saito Y
    Dig Endosc; 2022 Jul; 34(5):1042-1051. PubMed ID: 34963034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large (20-30 mm) flat colorectal lesions.
    Oh CK; Cho YW; Choi IH; Lee HH; Lim CH; Kim JS; Lee BI; Cho YS
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Mar; 37(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 34845766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term Outcomes After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Trial From Japan.
    Ohata K; Kobayashi N; Sakai E; Takeuchi Y; Chino A; Takamaru H; Kodashima S; Hotta K; Harada K; Ikematsu H; Uraoka T; Murakami T; Tsuji S; Abe T; Katagiri A; Hori S; Michida T; Suzuki T; Fukuzawa M; Kiriyama S; Fukase K; Murakami Y; Ishikawa H; Saito Y
    Gastroenterology; 2022 Nov; 163(5):1423-1434.e2. PubMed ID: 35810779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection.
    Suzuki T; Kitagawa Y; Nankinzan R; Hara T; Yamaguchi T
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2019; 82(3):375-378. PubMed ID: 31566324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection
    Shahini E; Passera R; Lo Secco G; Arezzo A
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Aug; 31(6):835-847. PubMed ID: 35112654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.
    Saito Y; Fukuzawa M; Matsuda T; Fukunaga S; Sakamoto T; Uraoka T; Nakajima T; Ikehara H; Fu KI; Itoi T; Fujii T
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Feb; 24(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 19517168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: A systematic review.
    De Ceglie A; Hassan C; Mangiavillano B; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Ridola L; Bhandari P; Boeri F; Conio M
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2016 Aug; 104():138-55. PubMed ID: 27370173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
    Backes Y; Moons LM; van Bergeijk JD; Berk L; Ter Borg F; Ter Borg PC; Elias SG; Geesing JM; Groen JN; Hadithi M; Hardwick JC; Kerkhof M; Mangen MJ; Straathof JW; Schröder R; Schwartz MP; Spanier BW; de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH; Wolfhagen FH; Koch AD
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 16(1):56. PubMed ID: 27229709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tip-in EMR as an alternative to endoscopic submucosal dissection for 20- to 30-mm nonpedunculated colorectal neoplasms.
    Takada K; Hotta K; Imai K; Ito S; Kishida Y; Minamide T; Yamamoto Y; Yabuuchi Y; Yoshida M; Maeda Y; Kawata N; Takizawa K; Ishiwatari H; Matsubayashi H; Kawabata T; Ono H
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Nov; 96(5):849-856.e3. PubMed ID: 35798055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Lim XC; Nistala KRY; Ng CH; Lin SY; Tan DJH; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 27(25):3925-3939. PubMed ID: 34321855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Matched case-control study comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors.
    Kobayashi N; Yoshitake N; Hirahara Y; Konishi J; Saito Y; Matsuda T; Ishikawa T; Sekiguchi R; Fujimori T
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Apr; 27(4):728-33. PubMed ID: 22004124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a rescue treatment in difficult colorectal ESD cases.
    Okamoto K; Muguruma N; Kagemoto K; Mitsui Y; Fujimoto D; Kitamura S; Kimura T; Sogabe M; Miyamoto H; Takayama T
    Dig Endosc; 2017 Apr; 29 Suppl 2():45-52. PubMed ID: 28425649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors.
    Tajika M; Niwa Y; Bhatia V; Kondo S; Tanaka T; Mizuno N; Hara K; Hijioka S; Imaoka H; Ogura T; Haba S; Yamao K
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Nov; 23(11):1042-9. PubMed ID: 21869682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for 20-30 mm colorectal polyps.
    Inoue T; Nakagawa K; Yamasaki Y; Shichijo S; Kanesaka T; Maekawa A; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Takeuchi Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2549-2557. PubMed ID: 33724540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment strategy for local recurrences after endoscopic resection of a colorectal neoplasm.
    Ito S; Hotta K; Imai K; Yamaguchi Y; Kishida Y; Takizawa K; Kakushima N; Kawata N; Yoshida M; Ishiwatari H; Matsubayashi H; Ono H
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Apr; 33(4):1140-1146. PubMed ID: 30043171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity score-matched analysis of endoscopic resection for recurrent colorectal neoplasms: A pilot study.
    Ohmori M; Yamasaki Y; Iwagami H; Nakahira H; Matsuura N; Shichijo S; Maekawa A; Kanesaka T; Yamamoto S; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Okada H; Takeuchi Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2568-2574. PubMed ID: 33843099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of clinical outcomes among different endoscopic resection methods for treating colorectal neoplasia.
    Kim YJ; Kim ES; Cho KB; Park KS; Jang BK; Chung WJ; Hwang JS
    Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Jun; 58(6):1727-36. PubMed ID: 23385636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Technical advantages compared to endoscopic mucosal resection and minimally invasive surgery.
    Saito Y; Yamada M; So E; Abe S; Sakamoto T; Nakajima T; Otake Y; Ono A; Matsuda T
    Dig Endosc; 2014 Jan; 26 Suppl 1():52-61. PubMed ID: 24191896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions larger than 10 cm.
    Chiba H; Ohata K; Tachikawa J; Yamada K; Okada N; Arimoto J; Ashikari K; Kuwabara H; Nakaoka M; Sakai E; Goto T
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jul; 36(7):5348-5355. PubMed ID: 34997339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic submucosal dissection or piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection for large superficial colorectal lesions: A cost effectiveness study.
    Stéphane S; Timothée W; Jérémie A; Raphael O; Martin D; Emmanuelle P; Elodie L; Quentin D; Nikki C; Sonia B; Hugo L; Guillaume G; Romain L; Mathieu P; Sophie G; Jeremie J
    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2022; 46(6):101969. PubMed ID: 35659602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.