These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34963669)

  • 1. Incorrect Surgical Counts: A Potential for Retained Surgical Items.
    Nelson P
    J Dr Nurs Pract; 2021 Nov; 14(3):213-224. PubMed ID: 34963669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines in Practice: Prevention of Unintentionally Retained Surgical Items.
    Cochran K
    AORN J; 2022 Nov; 116(5):427-440. PubMed ID: 36301066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guideline Implementation: Prevention of Retained Surgical Items.
    Fencl JL
    AORN J; 2016 Jul; 104(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 27350354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients count on it: an initiative to reduce incorrect counts and prevent retained surgical items.
    Norton EK; Martin C; Micheli AJ
    AORN J; 2012 Jan; 95(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 22201575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementing AORN recommended practices for prevention of retained surgical items.
    Goldberg JL; Feldman DL
    AORN J; 2012 Feb; 95(2):205-16; quiz 217-9. PubMed ID: 22283912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Back to Basics: Counting Soft Surgical Goods.
    Spruce L
    AORN J; 2016 Mar; 103(3):298-301; quiz 302-3. PubMed ID: 26924368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk Reduction Strategy to Decrease Incidence of Retained Surgical Items.
    Kaplan HJ; Spiera ZC; Feldman DL; Shamamian P; Portnoy B; Ioannides P; Leitman IM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Sep; 235(3):494-499. PubMed ID: 35972170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preventing Retained Surgical Items During Endovascular Procedures: Bridging the Gap Between Guidelines and Practice.
    Endicott KM; Friedrich R; Custer JW; Sarkar R; Rowen L; Anders MG
    AORN J; 2020 Dec; 112(6):625-633. PubMed ID: 33252796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical count practice variability and the potential for retained surgical items.
    Edel EM
    AORN J; 2012 Feb; 95(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 22283914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effectiveness of radiofrequency scanning technology in preventing retained surgical items: An integrative review.
    Peng J; Ang SY; Zhou H; Nair A
    J Clin Nurs; 2023 Jul; 32(13-14):3315-3327. PubMed ID: 35818318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical count process for prevention of retained surgical items: an integrative review.
    Freitas PS; Silveira RC; Clark AM; Galvão CM
    J Clin Nurs; 2016 Jul; 25(13-14):1835-47. PubMed ID: 27104785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Multicenter Collaborative Effort to Reduce Preventable Patient Harm Due to Retained Surgical Items.
    Carmack A; Valleru J; Randall K; Baka D; Angarano J; Fogel R
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2023 Jan; 49(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 36334991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommended practices for sponge, sharp, and instrument counts. AORN Recommended Practices Committee. Association of periOperative Registered Nurses.
    AORN J; 1999 Dec; 70(6):1083-9. PubMed ID: 10635432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Miscount incidents: a novel approach to exploring risk factors for unintentionally retained surgical items.
    Judson TJ; Howell MD; Guglielmi C; Canacari E; Sands K
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2013 Oct; 39(10):468-74. PubMed ID: 24195200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A nurse-led approach to developing and implementing a collaborative count policy.
    Norton EK; Micheli AJ; Gedney J; Felkerson TM
    AORN J; 2012 Feb; 95(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 22283913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Natural history of retained surgical items supports the need for team training, early recognition, and prompt retrieval.
    Stawicki SP; Cook CH; Anderson HL; Chowayou L; Cipolla J; Ahmed HM; Coyle SM; Gracias VH; Evans DC; Marchigiani R; Adams RC; Seamon MJ; Martin ND; Steinberg SM; Moffatt-Bruce SD;
    Am J Surg; 2014 Jul; 208(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 24524864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorrect surgical counts: a qualitative analysis.
    Rowlands A; Steeves R
    AORN J; 2010 Oct; 92(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 20888943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of a radiofrequency detection system as an adjunct to manual counting protocols for tracking surgical sponges: a prospective trial of 2,285 patients.
    Rupp CC; Kagarise MJ; Nelson SM; Deal AM; Phillips S; Chadwick J; Petty T; Meyer AA; Kim HJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Oct; 215(4):524-33. PubMed ID: 22770865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Avoiding Retained Surgical Items at an Academic Medical Center: Sustainability of a Surgical Quality Improvement Project.
    Cima RR; Bearden BA; Kollengode A; Nienow JM; Weisbrod CA; Dowdy SC; Amstutz GJ; Narr BJ
    Am J Med Qual; 2022 May-Jun 01; 37(3):236-245. PubMed ID: 34803134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical counts can be risky business!
    Porteous J
    Can Oper Room Nurs J; 2004 Dec; 22(4):6-8, 10, 12. PubMed ID: 15709630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.