These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34964373)

  • 1. Physical Attractiveness Biases Judgments Pertaining to the Moral Domain of Purity.
    Klebl C; Rhee JJ; Greenaway KH; Luo Y; Bastian B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Feb; 49(2):282-295. PubMed ID: 34964373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond Aesthetic Judgment: Beauty Increases Moral Standing Through Perceptions of Purity.
    Klebl C; Luo Y; Bastian B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 Jun; 48(6):954-967. PubMed ID: 34167390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judgments of moral responsibility and wrongness for intentional and accidental harm and purity violations.
    Parkinson M; Byrne RMJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 28059634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moral Judgments of COVID-19 Social Distancing Violations: The Roles of Perceived Harm and Impurity.
    Rosenfeld DL; Tomiyama AJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 May; 48(5):766-781. PubMed ID: 34247528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shared brain activity for aesthetic and moral judgments: implications for the Beauty-is-Good stereotype.
    Tsukiura T; Cabeza R
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 6(1):138-48. PubMed ID: 20231177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Different influences of facial attractiveness on judgments of moral beauty and moral goodness.
    Cui X; Cheng Q; Lin W; Lin J; Mo L
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):12152. PubMed ID: 31434984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The dorsomedial prefrontal cortex mediates the interaction between moral and aesthetic valuation: a TMS study on the beauty-is-good stereotype.
    Ferrari C; Nadal M; Schiavi S; Vecchi T; Cela-Conde CJ; Cattaneo Z
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 May; 12(5):707-717. PubMed ID: 28158864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moderators of the Liking Bias in Judgments of Moral Character.
    Bocian K; Baryla W; Wojciszke B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 Apr; 48(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 34044652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beautiful seems good, but perhaps not in every way: Linking attractiveness to moral evaluation through perceived vanity.
    Han DE; Laurent SM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Feb; 124(2):264-286. PubMed ID: 35653733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deconstructing moral character judgments.
    Hartman R; Blakey W; Gray K
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Feb; 43():205-212. PubMed ID: 34418790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Group-based discrimination in judgments of moral purity-related behaviors: experimental and archival evidence.
    Masicampo EJ; Barth M; Ambady N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Dec; 143(6):2135-52. PubMed ID: 25199041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural responses to facial attractiveness in the judgments of moral goodness and moral beauty.
    Cheng Q; Han Z; Liu S; Kong Y; Weng X; Mo L
    Brain Struct Funct; 2022 Apr; 227(3):843-863. PubMed ID: 34767078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The boundary conditions of the liking bias in moral character judgments.
    Bocian K; Szarek KM; Miazek K; Baryla W; Wojciszke B
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17217. PubMed ID: 36241672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.
    Guglielmo S
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():334-337. PubMed ID: 28803616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
    Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is purity a distinct and homogeneous domain in moral psychology?
    Kollareth D; Brownell H; Durán JI; Russell JA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):211-235. PubMed ID: 35901410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inferences about moral character moderate the impact of consequences on blame and praise.
    Siegel JZ; Crockett MJ; Dolan RJ
    Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():201-211. PubMed ID: 28527671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anticipated affect predicts moral praise and character judgments.
    Amormino P; Mercier B; Inbar Y
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2024 Aug; 127(2):259-276. PubMed ID: 38206852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asking 'why?' enhances theory of mind when evaluating harm but not purity violations.
    Dungan JA; Young L
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 14(7):699-708. PubMed ID: 31269193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Many moral buttons or just one? Evidence from emotional facial expressions.
    Franchin L; Geipel J; Hadjichristidis C; Surian L
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Aug; 33(5):943-958. PubMed ID: 30200861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.