136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34965363)
1. Adapting Audiology Procedures During the Pandemic: Validity and Efficacy of Testing Outside a Sound Booth.
Serpanos YC; Hobbs M; Nunez K; Gambino L; Butler J
Am J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 31(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 34965363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pure-tone audiometry outside a sound booth using earphone attentuation, integrated noise monitoring, and automation.
Swanepoel de W; Matthysen C; Eikelboom RH; Clark JL; Hall JW
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(11):777-85. PubMed ID: 26514954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ambient noise impact on accuracy of automated hearing assessment.
Storey KK; Muñoz K; Nelson L; Larsen J; White K
Int J Audiol; 2014 Oct; 53(10):730-6. PubMed ID: 24909592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Smartphone-Facilitated In-Situ Hearing Aid Audiometry for Community-Based Hearing Testing.
Frisby C; De Sousa KC; Eikelboom RH; Mahomed-Asmail F; Moore DR; de Kock T; Manchaiah V; Swanepoel W
Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):1019-1032. PubMed ID: 38424667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Remote Hearing Assessment in a Rural Community.
Visagie A; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH
Telemed J E Health; 2015 Nov; 21(11):930-7. PubMed ID: 26076335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extended High-Frequency Audiometry using the Wireless Automated Hearing Test System Compared to Manual Audiometry in Children and Adolescents.
Blankenship CM; Hickson LM; Quigley T; Larsen E; Lin L; Hunter LL
medRxiv; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37292836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated Audiometry in Quiet and Simulated Exam Room Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Impaired Hearing.
Bean BN; Roberts RA; Picou EM; Angley GP; Edwards AJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 34034339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Smartphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary health-care contexts.
Sandström J; Swanepoel de W; Carel Myburgh H; Laurent C
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 26795898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory Processing Testing: In the Booth versus Outside the Booth.
Lucker JR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):679-684. PubMed ID: 28906239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons of air-conduction hearing thresholds between manual and automated methods in a commercial audiometer.
Liu H; Fu X; Li M; Wang S
Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1292395. PubMed ID: 38188027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of the Home Hearing Test: Implications for Public Health.
Mosley CL; Langley LM; Davis A; McMahon CM; Tremblay KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30461396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.
Bornman M; Swanepoel W; De Jager LB; Eikelboom RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The GoAudio Quantitative Mobile Audiology Test Enhances Access to Clinical Hearing Assessments.
Koleilat A; Argue DP; Schimmenti LA; Ekker SC; Poling GL
Am J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 29(4):887-897. PubMed ID: 33079580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults.
Maclennan-Smith F; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer.
Bastianelli M; Mark AE; McAfee A; Schramm D; Lefrançois R; Bromwich M
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):59. PubMed ID: 31699157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Going wireless and booth-less for hearing testing in industry.
Meinke DK; Norris JA; Flynn BP; Clavier OH
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):41-51. PubMed ID: 27976975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic pure-tone audiometry in schools: mobile testing without a sound-treated environment.
Swanepoel de W; Maclennan-Smith F; Hall JW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):992-1000. PubMed ID: 24384084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
