377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34965492)
1. Multi-vehicle interaction safety of connected automated vehicles in merging area: A real-time risk assessment approach.
Zhu J; Ma Y; Lou Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106546. PubMed ID: 34965492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Network-wide safety impacts of dedicated lanes for connected and autonomous vehicles.
Sha H; Singh MK; Haouari R; Papazikou E; Quddus M; Quigley C; Chaudhry A; Thomas P; Weijermars W; Morris A
Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107424. PubMed ID: 38091887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comprehensive safety assessment in mixed fleets with connected and automated vehicles: A crash severity and rate evaluation of conventional vehicles.
Sinha A; Chand S; Wijayaratna KP; Virdi N; Dixit V
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105567. PubMed ID: 32361477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utilizing UAV video data for in-depth analysis of drivers' crash risk at interchange merging areas.
Gu X; Abdel-Aty M; Xiang Q; Cai Q; Yuan J
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():159-169. PubMed ID: 30513457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety analysis of freeway on-ramp merging with the presence of autonomous vehicles.
Zhu J; Tasic I
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():105966. PubMed ID: 33493941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From conflicts to crashes: Simulating macroscopic connected and automated driving vehicle safety.
Oikonomou MG; Ziakopoulos A; Chaudhry A; Thomas P; Yannis G
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jul; 187():107087. PubMed ID: 37094536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the safety impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on motorways.
Papadoulis A; Quddus M; Imprialou M
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():12-22. PubMed ID: 30610995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A co-evolutionary lane-changing trajectory planning method for automated vehicles based on the instantaneous risk identification.
Wu J; Chen X; Bie Y; Zhou W
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106907. PubMed ID: 36455450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vehicle crash simulations for safety: Introduction of connected and automated vehicles on the roadways.
Ren R; Li H; Han T; Tian C; Zhang C; Zhang J; Proctor RW; Chen Y; Feng Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107021. PubMed ID: 36965209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co-simulation platform.
Chen P; Ni H; Wang L; Yu G; Sun J
Accid Anal Prev; 2024 May; 199():107530. PubMed ID: 38437756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of cyberattacks on safety and stability of connected and automated vehicle platoons under lane changes.
Khattak ZH; Smith BL; Fontaine MD
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105861. PubMed ID: 33445034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Collaborative Merging Method for Connected and Automated Vehicle Platoons in a Freeway Merging Area with Considerations for Safety and Efficiency.
Gao H; Cen Y; Liu B; Song X; Liu H; Liu J
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 37177606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk perception and the warning strategy based on safety potential field theory.
Li L; Gan J; Yi Z; Qu X; Ran B
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105805. PubMed ID: 33120182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Developing dynamic speed limit strategies for mixed traffic flow to reduce collision risks at freeway bottlenecks.
Li Y; Pan B; Xing L; Yang M; Dai J
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 175():106781. PubMed ID: 35926373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Collision-avoidance lane change control method for enhancing safety for connected vehicle platoon in mixed traffic environment.
Ma Y; Liu Q; Fu J; Liufu K; Li Q
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 May; 184():106999. PubMed ID: 36780868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Existence of connected and autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic: Impacts on safety and environment.
Wei S; Shao M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):390-399. PubMed ID: 38165395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proactive crash risk prediction modeling for merging assistance system at interchange merging areas.
Gu X; Cai Q; Lee J; Xiang Q; Ma Y; Xu X
Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(3):234-240. PubMed ID: 32154738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A Bayesian Driver Agent Model for Autonomous Vehicles System Based on Knowledge-Aware and Real-Time Data.
Ma J; Xie H; Song K; Liu H
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33418987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction and analysis of likelihood of freeway crash occurrence considering risky driving behavior.
Ma Y; Zhang J; Lu J; Chen S; Xing G; Feng R
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107244. PubMed ID: 37573710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential risk assessment for safe driving of autonomous vehicles under occluded vision.
Wang D; Fu W; Song Q; Zhou J
Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4981. PubMed ID: 35322105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
