These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34965492)

  • 21. Detection and Risk Analysis with Lane-Changing Decision Algorithms for Autonomous Vehicles.
    Mechernene A; Judalet V; Chaibet A; Boukhnifer M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 36365846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Dynamic Lane-Changing Driving Strategy for CAV in Diverging Areas Based on MPC System.
    Liu H; Song X; Liu B; Liu J; Gao H; Liang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 36679356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rear-end collision warning of connected automated vehicles based on a novel stochastic local multivehicle optimal velocity model.
    Wen J; Wu C; Zhang R; Xiao X; Nv N; Shi Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105800. PubMed ID: 33128992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A proactive lane-changing risk prediction framework considering driving intention recognition and different lane-changing patterns.
    Shangguan Q; Fu T; Wang J; Fang S; Fu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jan; 164():106500. PubMed ID: 34823098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Simulation-Based Analysis of "What-If" Scenarios with Connected and Automated Vehicles Navigating Roundabouts.
    Tumminello ML; Macioszek E; Granà A; Giuffrè T
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 36081134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interactive Lane Keeping System for Autonomous Vehicles Using LSTM-RNN Considering Driving Environments.
    Jeong Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A safety assessment of mixed fleets with Connected and Autonomous Vehicles using the Surrogate Safety Assessment Module.
    Virdi N; Grzybowska H; Waller ST; Dixit V
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():95-111. PubMed ID: 31233998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficient mapping of crash risk at intersections with connected vehicle data and deep learning models.
    Hu J; Huang MC; Yu X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105665. PubMed ID: 32683130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Novel Intelligent Approach to Lane-Change Behavior Prediction for Intelligent and Connected Vehicles.
    Du L; Chen W; Ji J; Pei Z; Tong B; Zheng H
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():9516218. PubMed ID: 35082845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimation of traffic conflicts using precise lateral position and width of vehicles for safety assessment.
    Charly A; Mathew TV
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105264. PubMed ID: 31450115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A freeway vehicle early warning method based on risk map: Enhancing traffic safety through global perspective characterization of driving risk.
    Cui C; An B; Li L; Qu X; Manda H; Ran B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107611. PubMed ID: 38733809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Time-varying mixed logit model for vehicle merging behavior in work zone merging areas.
    Weng J; Du G; Li D; Yu Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():328-339. PubMed ID: 29754006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intersection two-vehicle crash scenario specification for automated vehicle safety evaluation using sequence analysis and Bayesian networks.
    Song Y; Chitturi MV; Noyce DA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106814. PubMed ID: 36029554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Trajectory planning framework for autonomous vehicles based on collision injury prediction for vulnerable road users.
    Guo Y; Liu Y; Wang B; Huang P; Xu H; Bai Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107610. PubMed ID: 38749269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact Evaluation of Cyberattacks on Connected and Automated Vehicles in Mixed Traffic Flow and Its Resilient and Robust Control Strategy.
    Wang T; Tu M; Lyu H; Li Y; Orfila O; Zou G; Gruyer D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36616672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new method of temporal and spatial risk estimation for lane change considering conventional recognition defects.
    Wu J; Wen H; Qi W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105796. PubMed ID: 33099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of a real-time crash risk prediction model incorporating the various crash mechanisms across different traffic states.
    Xu C; Wang W; Liu P; Zhang F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 24697528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multi-level Bayesian safety analysis with unprocessed Automatic Vehicle Identification data for an urban expressway.
    Shi Q; Abdel-Aty M; Yu R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Mar; 88():68-76. PubMed ID: 26722989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A new integrated collision risk assessment methodology for autonomous vehicles.
    Katrakazas C; Quddus M; Chen WH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jun; 127():61-79. PubMed ID: 30836293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.
    Spicer R; Vahabaghaie A; Bahouth G; Drees L; Martinez von Bülow R; Baur P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S91-S95. PubMed ID: 30543454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.