161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34965599)
1. The Impact of Neurocognitive Skills on Recognition of Spectrally Degraded Sentences.
Lewis JH; Castellanos I; Moberly AC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Sep; 32(8):528-536. PubMed ID: 34965599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
Moberly AC; Mattingly JK; Castellanos I
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spectral-Temporal Trade-Off in Vocoded Sentence Recognition: Effects of Age, Hearing Thresholds, and Working Memory.
Shader MJ; Yancey CM; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1226-1235. PubMed ID: 32032222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.
Tamati TN; Ray C; Vasil KJ; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):324-335. PubMed ID: 31580802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Audiovisual Processing Skills Before Cochlear Implantation Predict Postoperative Speech Recognition in Adults.
Moberly AC; Pisoni DB; Tamati TN
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):617-625. PubMed ID: 38143302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-Variability Sentence Recognition in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users: Associations With Rapid Phonological Coding and Executive Functioning.
Smith GNL; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1149-1161. PubMed ID: 30601227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.
Richter ME; Chatterjee M
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1727-1740. PubMed ID: 34294630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonverbal Reasoning as a Contributor to Sentence Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.
Mattingly JK; Castellanos I; Moberly AC
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e956-e963. PubMed ID: 30444843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of stimulus modality, task complexity, and cuing on working memory and the relationship with speech recognition in older cochlear implant users.
Luo X; Azuma T; Kolberg C; Pulling KR
J Commun Disord; 2022; 95():106170. PubMed ID: 34839068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recognition of Accented Speech by Cochlear-Implant Listeners: Benefit of Audiovisual Cues.
Waddington E; Jaekel BN; Tinnemore AR; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1236-1250. PubMed ID: 32069269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Making Sense of Sentences: Top-Down Processing of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Moberly AC; Reed J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 62(8):2895-2905. PubMed ID: 31330118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contribution of Verbal Learning & Memory and Spectro-Temporal Discrimination to Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
Harris MS; Hamel BL; Wichert K; Kozlowski K; Mleziva S; Ray C; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Moberly AC
Laryngoscope; 2023 Mar; 133(3):661-669. PubMed ID: 35567421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How does aging affect recognition of spectrally degraded speech?
Moberly AC; Vasil KJ; Wucinich TL; Safdar N; Boyce L; Roup C; Holt RF; Adunka OF; Castellanos I; Shafiro V; Houston DM; Pisoni DB
Laryngoscope; 2018 Nov; 128 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):. PubMed ID: 30325518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perception of Child-Directed Versus Adult-Directed Emotional Speech in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users.
Barrett KC; Chatterjee M; Caldwell MT; Deroche MLD; Jiradejvong P; Kulkarni AM; Limb CJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1372-1382. PubMed ID: 32149924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
