189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34965805)
1. Computer-assisted mitotic count using a deep learning-based algorithm improves interobserver reproducibility and accuracy.
Bertram CA; Aubreville M; Donovan TA; Bartel A; Wilm F; Marzahl C; Assenmacher CA; Becker K; Bennett M; Corner S; Cossic B; Denk D; Dettwiler M; Gonzalez BG; Gurtner C; Haverkamp AK; Heier A; Lehmbecker A; Merz S; Noland EL; Plog S; Schmidt A; Sebastian F; Sledge DG; Smedley RC; Tecilla M; Thaiwong T; Fuchs-Baumgartinger A; Meuten DJ; Breininger K; Kiupel M; Maier A; Klopfleisch R
Vet Pathol; 2022 Mar; 59(2):211-226. PubMed ID: 34965805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized Calculation of Mitotic Count Distribution in Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumor Sections: Mitotic Count Is Area Dependent.
Bertram CA; Aubreville M; Gurtner C; Bartel A; Corner SM; Dettwiler M; Kershaw O; Noland EL; Schmidt A; Sledge DG; Smedley RC; Thaiwong T; Kiupel M; Maier A; Klopfleisch R
Vet Pathol; 2020 Mar; 57(2):214-226. PubMed ID: 31808382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deep learning algorithms out-perform veterinary pathologists in detecting the mitotically most active tumor region.
Aubreville M; Bertram CA; Marzahl C; Gurtner C; Dettwiler M; Schmidt A; Bartenschlager F; Merz S; Fragoso M; Kershaw O; Klopfleisch R; Maier A
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16447. PubMed ID: 33020510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mitotic Figures-Normal, Atypical, and Imposters: A Guide to Identification.
Donovan TA; Moore FM; Bertram CA; Luong R; Bolfa P; Klopfleisch R; Tvedten H; Salas EN; Whitley DB; Aubreville M; Meuten DJ
Vet Pathol; 2021 Mar; 58(2):243-257. PubMed ID: 33371818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses.
Pantanowitz L; Hartman D; Qi Y; Cho EY; Suh B; Paeng K; Dhir R; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Song SY; Cho SY
Diagn Pathol; 2020 Jul; 15(1):80. PubMed ID: 32622359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of mitotic cell quantification via microscopy and multiple whole-slide scanners.
Tabata K; Uraoka N; Benhamida J; Hanna MG; Sirintrapun SJ; Gallas BD; Gong Q; Aly RG; Emoto K; Matsuda KM; Hameed MR; Klimstra DS; Yagi Y
Diagn Pathol; 2019 Jun; 14(1):65. PubMed ID: 31238983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deep learning assisted mitotic counting for breast cancer.
Balkenhol MCA; Tellez D; Vreuls W; Clahsen PC; Pinckaers H; Ciompi F; Bult P; van der Laak JAWM
Lab Invest; 2019 Nov; 99(11):1596-1606. PubMed ID: 31222166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated Computational Detection, Quantitation, and Mapping of Mitosis in Whole-Slide Images for Clinically Actionable Surgical Pathology Decision Support.
Puri M; Hoover SB; Hewitt SM; Wei BR; Adissu HA; Halsey CHC; Beck J; Bradley C; Cramer SD; Durham AC; Esplin DG; Frank C; Lyle LT; McGill LD; Sánchez MD; Schaffer PA; Traslavina RP; Buza E; Yang HH; Lee MP; Dwyer JE; Simpson RM
J Pathol Inform; 2019; 10():4. PubMed ID: 30915258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of myocardial fibrosis by digital image analysis: An adjunctive tool for pathologist "ground truth".
Abecasis J; Cortez-Dias N; Pinto DG; Lopes P; Madeira M; Ramos S; Gil V; Cardim N; Félix A
Cardiovasc Pathol; 2023; 65():107541. PubMed ID: 37127060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Risk Stratification Utilizing Phospho-Histone H3 Evaluated by Manual Counting and Computer-Assisted Image Analysis.
Jin C; Huang Y; Nasim M; Yang Y; Lee L
Int J Surg Pathol; 2019 Oct; 27(7):706-712. PubMed ID: 31146625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Histological classification of canine and feline lymphoma using a modular approach based on deep learning and advanced image processing.
Haghofer A; Fuchs-Baumgartinger A; Lipnik K; Klopfleisch R; Aubreville M; Scharinger J; Weissenböck H; Winkler SM; Bertram CA
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):19436. PubMed ID: 37945699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Deep Learning Assistance on the Histopathologic Review of Lymph Nodes for Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Steiner DF; MacDonald R; Liu Y; Truszkowski P; Hipp JD; Gammage C; Thng F; Peng L; Stumpe MC
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Dec; 42(12):1636-1646. PubMed ID: 30312179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated diagnosis of 7 canine skin tumors using machine learning on H&E-stained whole slide images.
Fragoso-Garcia M; Wilm F; Bertram CA; Merz S; Schmidt A; Donovan T; Fuchs-Baumgartinger A; Bartel A; Marzahl C; Diehl L; Puget C; Maier A; Aubreville M; Breininger K; Klopfleisch R
Vet Pathol; 2023 Nov; 60(6):865-875. PubMed ID: 37515411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mitotic figure recognition: agreement among pathologists and computerized detector.
Malon C; Brachtel E; Cosatto E; Graf HP; Kurata A; Kuroda M; Meyer JS; Saito A; Wu S; Yagi Y
Anal Cell Pathol (Amst); 2012; 35(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 21965283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A large-scale dataset for mitotic figure assessment on whole slide images of canine cutaneous mast cell tumor.
Bertram CA; Aubreville M; Marzahl C; Maier A; Klopfleisch R
Sci Data; 2019 Nov; 6(1):274. PubMed ID: 31754105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concordance in Breast Cancer Grading by Artificial Intelligence on Whole Slide Images Compares With a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Breast Pathologists.
Mantrala S; Ginter PS; Mitkari A; Joshi S; Prabhala H; Ramachandra V; Kini L; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar AB; Wilson P; Singh K; Harigopal M; Koka D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Nov; 146(11):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 35271701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.
Ehteshami Bejnordi B; Veta M; Johannes van Diest P; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N; Litjens G; van der Laak JAWM; ; Hermsen M; Manson QF; Balkenhol M; Geessink O; Stathonikos N; van Dijk MC; Bult P; Beca F; Beck AH; Wang D; Khosla A; Gargeya R; Irshad H; Zhong A; Dou Q; Li Q; Chen H; Lin HJ; Heng PA; Haß C; Bruni E; Wong Q; Halici U; Öner MÜ; Cetin-Atalay R; Berseth M; Khvatkov V; Vylegzhanin A; Kraus O; Shaban M; Rajpoot N; Awan R; Sirinukunwattana K; Qaiser T; Tsang YW; Tellez D; Annuscheit J; Hufnagl P; Valkonen M; Kartasalo K; Latonen L; Ruusuvuori P; Liimatainen K; Albarqouni S; Mungal B; George A; Demirci S; Navab N; Watanabe S; Seno S; Takenaka Y; Matsuda H; Ahmady Phoulady H; Kovalev V; Kalinovsky A; Liauchuk V; Bueno G; Fernandez-Carrobles MM; Serrano I; Deniz O; Racoceanu D; Venâncio R
JAMA; 2017 Dec; 318(22):2199-2210. PubMed ID: 29234806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Quantify Glomerulosclerosis in Kidney Biopsy Specimens.
Marsh JN; Liu TC; Wilson PC; Swamidass SJ; Gaut JP
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jan; 4(1):e2030939. PubMed ID: 33471115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deep learning outperformed 11 pathologists in the classification of histopathological melanoma images.
Hekler A; Utikal JS; Enk AH; Solass W; Schmitt M; Klode J; Schadendorf D; Sondermann W; Franklin C; Bestvater F; Flaig MJ; Krahl D; von Kalle C; Fröhling S; Brinker TJ
Eur J Cancer; 2019 Sep; 118():91-96. PubMed ID: 31325876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
