BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34966116)

  • 1. Small bowel feeding: do you pay the price for bypassing the stomach?
    Bond A; Czapran A; Lal S
    Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care; 2022 Mar; 25(2):116-121. PubMed ID: 34966116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gastric Versus Small Bowel Feeding in Critically Ill Adults.
    Schlein K
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2016 Aug; 31(4):514-22. PubMed ID: 26920643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Successful Identification of Anatomical Markers and Placement of Feeding Tubes in Critically Ill Patients via Camera-Assisted Technology with Real-Time Video Guidance.
    Wischmeyer PE; McMoon MM; Waldron NH; Dye EJ
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2019 Jan; 43(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 29924386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Postpyloric feeding tubes for surgical intensive care patients. Pilot series to evaluate two methods for bedside placement].
    Schröder S; van Hülst S; Claussen M; Petersen K; Pich B; Bein B; von Spiegel T
    Anaesthesist; 2011 Mar; 60(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 21057767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing early enteral nutrition with the use of self-advancing postpyloric feeding tube in critically ill children.
    Khlevner J; Antino J; Panesar R; Chawla A
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2012 Nov; 36(6):750-2. PubMed ID: 22492399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bedside placement of small bowel feeding tubes in hospitalized patients: a new role for the dietitian.
    Cresci G; Martindale R
    Nutrition; 2003 Oct; 19(10):843-6. PubMed ID: 14559318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gastric versus postpyloric feeding.
    Drover JW
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2007 Oct; 17(4):765-75. PubMed ID: 17967380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of postpyloric tube feeding and gastric tube feeding in intensive care unit patients: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang Z; Xu X; Ding J; Ni H
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2013 Jun; 28(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 23614960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Severity of illness influences the efficacy of enteral feeding route on clinical outcomes in patients with critical illness.
    Huang HH; Chang SJ; Hsu CW; Chang TM; Kang SP; Liu MY
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2012 Aug; 112(8):1138-46. PubMed ID: 22682883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maintaining Enteral Nutrition in the Severely Ill using a Newly Developed Nasojejunal Feeding Tube with Gastric Decompression Function.
    Toh Yoon EW; Nishihara K; Murata H
    Intern Med; 2016; 55(20):2945-2950. PubMed ID: 27746430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Jejunal feeding tubes can be efficiently and independently placed by intensive care unit teams.
    Welpe P; Frutiger A; Vanek P; Kleger GR
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2010; 34(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 20067951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nasogastric tube versus postpyloric tube feeding for critical illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li L; Huang J
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2024 Sep; 33(3):283-297. PubMed ID: 38965718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gastric versus post-pyloric feeding: relationship to tolerance, pneumonia risk, and successful delivery of enteral nutrition.
    Ukleja A; Sanchez-Fermin M
    Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2007 Aug; 9(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 17883980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing early nasojejunal with nasogastric nutrition in critical illness.
    Davies AR; Morrison SS; Bailey MJ; Bellomo R; Cooper DJ; Doig GS; Finfer SR; Heyland DK; ;
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Aug; 40(8):2342-8. PubMed ID: 22809907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bedside sonographic-guided versus blind nasoenteric feeding tube placement in critically ill patients.
    Hernández-Socorro CR; Marin J; Ruiz-Santana S; Santana L; Manzano JL
    Crit Care Med; 1996 Oct; 24(10):1690-4. PubMed ID: 8874307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postpyloric Versus Gastric Tube Feeding for Preventing Pneumonia and Improving Nutritional Outcomes in Critically Ill Adults.
    Cooper AS
    Crit Care Nurse; 2018 Dec; 38(6):75-76. PubMed ID: 30504501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of an electromagnetic tube placement device versus a self-advancing nasal jejunal device for postpyloric feeding tube placement.
    Boyer N; McCarthy MS; Mount CA
    J Hosp Med; 2014 Jan; 9(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 24288360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolving role of post-ligament of Trietz nasojejunal feeding in enteral nutrition and the need for improved feeding tube design and placement methods.
    Silk DB
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2011 May; 35(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 21393640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised controlled feasibility and proof-of-concept trial in delayed gastric emptying when metoclopramide fails: We should revisit nasointestinal feeding versus dual prokinetic treatment: Achieving goal nutrition in critical illness and delayed gastric emptying: Trial of nasointestinal feeding versus nasogastric feeding plus prokinetics.
    Taylor SJ; Allan K; McWilliam H; Manara A; Brown J; Greenwood R; Toher D
    Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2016 Aug; 14():1-8. PubMed ID: 28531392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bedside videoscopic placement of feeding tubes: development of fiberoptics through the tube.
    Grathwohl KW; Gibbons RV; Dillard TA; Horwhat JD; Roth BJ; Thompson JW; Cambier PA
    Crit Care Med; 1997 Apr; 25(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 9142027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.