These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34967016)

  • 21. Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and candidate evaluations.
    Vescio TK; Schermerhorn NEC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jan; 118(2):. PubMed ID: 33397724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum.
    Graham J; Nosek BA; Haidt J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e50092. PubMed ID: 23251357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does truth matter to voters? The effects of correcting political misinformation in an Australian sample.
    Aird MJ; Ecker UKH; Swire B; Berinsky AJ; Lewandowsky S
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Dec; 5(12):180593. PubMed ID: 30662715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Negativity bias and basic values.
    Schwartz SH
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Jun; 37(3):328-9. PubMed ID: 24970450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages.
    Boer D; Fischer R
    Psychol Bull; 2013 Sep; 139(5):1113-47. PubMed ID: 23339521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lay theories of financial well-being predict political and policy message preferences.
    Krijnen JMT; Ülkümen G; Bogard JE; Fox CR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Feb; 122(2):310-336. PubMed ID: 35130024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The intent and extent of collective threats: A data-driven conceptualization of collective threats and their relation to political preferences.
    Kahn DT; Björklund F; Hirschberger G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 May; 151(5):1178-1198. PubMed ID: 34843368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sexism, racism, and nationalism: Factors associated with the 2016 U.S. presidential election results?
    Shook NJ; Fitzgerald HN; Boggs ST; Ford CG; Hopkins PD; Silva NM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229432. PubMed ID: 32150550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intolerance of uncertainty modulates brain-to-brain synchrony during politically polarized perception.
    van Baar JM; Halpern DJ; FeldmanHall O
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 May; 118(20):. PubMed ID: 33986114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measuring moral politics: How strict and nurturant family values explain individual differences in conservatism, liberalism, and the political middle.
    Feinberg M; Wehling E; Chung JM; Saslow LR; Melvær Paulin I
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Apr; 118(4):777-804. PubMed ID: 31246064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dining with liberals and conservatives: The social underpinnings of food neophobia.
    Guidetti M; Carraro L; Cavazza N
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262676. PubMed ID: 35085304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predicting attitudes towards easing COVID-19 restrictions in the United States of America: The role of health concerns, demographic, political, and individual difference factors.
    Gerace A; Rigney G; Anderson JR
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263128. PubMed ID: 35196316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adolescents' Evaluations of Political Leaders: The Case of President Donald Trump.
    Metzger A; Alvis L; Romm KF; Wray-Lake L; Syvertsen AK
    J Res Adolesc; 2020 Mar; 30(1):314-330. PubMed ID: 31930589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts.
    Kubin E; Puryear C; Schein C; Gray K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(6):. PubMed ID: 33495361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Early Adolescents Demonstrate Peer-Network Homophily in Political Attitudes and Values.
    Oosterhoff B; Poppler A; Palmer CA
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Jun; 33(6):874-888. PubMed ID: 35613458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Connections between viewing media about President Trump's dietary habits and fast food consumption intentions: Political differences and implications for public health.
    Myrick JG
    Appetite; 2020 Apr; 147():104545. PubMed ID: 31794820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Where the Rubber Meats the Road: Relationships between Vegetarianism and Socio-political Attitudes and Voting Behavior.
    Nezlek JB; Forestell CA
    Ecol Food Nutr; 2019; 58(6):548-559. PubMed ID: 31304788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is that disgust I see? Political ideology and biased visual attention.
    Oosterhoff B; Shook NJ; Ford C
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 336():227-235. PubMed ID: 28882691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Why are conservatives happier than liberals?
    Napier JL; Jost JT
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):565-72. PubMed ID: 18578846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Red brain, blue brain: evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans.
    Schreiber D; Fonzo G; Simmons AN; Dawes CT; Flagan T; Fowler JH; Paulus MP
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e52970. PubMed ID: 23418419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.