301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34967087)
1. Evaluation of readability and reliability of online patient information for intracranial aneurysms.
Patel CB; Kerr N; Ahmadi O; Muthu T
ANZ J Surg; 2022 Apr; 92(4):843-847. PubMed ID: 34967087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.
Ahmadi O; Louw J; Leinonen H; Gan PYC
Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 35(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 33769170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How readable and quality are online patient education materials about Helicobacter pylori?: Assessment of the readability, quality and reliability.
Yilmaz Hanci S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35543. PubMed ID: 37904459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Information for Patients and Their Families Regarding Schizophrenia.
Ekinci O; Koyuncu AN
J Nerv Ment Dis; 2024 May; 212(5):278-283. PubMed ID: 38416420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
Kong KA; Hu A
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on anosmia.
Raja H; Lodhi S
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Feb; 106(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 37051757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.
Ocmen E; Erdemir I; Aksu Erdost H; Hanci V
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38569. PubMed ID: 38905405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Readability of online patient education materials for parents after a failed newborn hearing screen.
Sax L; Razak A; Shetty K; Cohen M; Levi J
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():168-174. PubMed ID: 31326734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Hassan AK; Eleiwa TK; Hassan MA; Sallam AB; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Gise R; Phillips PH; Elhusseiny AM
J Neuroophthalmol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.
Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A
Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
Raja H; Almansoor ZR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Jan; 106(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 36748797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
