191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34967094)
1. Bioresorbable magnesium scaffold in the treatment of simple coronary bifurcation lesions: The BIFSORB pilot II study.
Barkholt TØ; Neghabat O; Holck EN; Andreasen LN; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Mar; 99(4):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 34967094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Procedural findings and early healing response after implantation of a self-apposing bioresorbable scaffold in coronary bifurcation lesions.
Holck EN; Fox-Maule C; Barkholt TØ; Jakobsen L; Tu S; Maeng M; Dijkstra J; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 35(7):1199-1210. PubMed ID: 31053981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complex bifurcation lesions: Randomized comparison of a fully bioresorbable modified t stenting strategy versus bifurcation reconstruction with a dedicated self-expanding stent in combination with bioresorbable scaffolds, an OCT study: Rationale and design of the COBRA II trial.
Bennett J; Adriaenssens T; Desmet W; Dubois C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(6):843-853. PubMed ID: 27184586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Side-Branch Dilation Techniques After Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold Implantation: A Bench Study.
de Pommereau A; Mogi S; de Hemptinne Q; Adjedj J; Varenne O; Picard F
J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 31(8):E249-E255. PubMed ID: 31368896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of strut thickness on acute mechanical performance: A comparison study using optical coherence tomography between DESolve 150 and DESolve 100.
Boeder NF; Dörr O; Bauer T; Mattesini A; Elsässer A; Liebetrau C; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
Int J Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 246():74-79. PubMed ID: 28579164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of acute expansion of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic drug-eluting stents in different degrees of calcification: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.
Ming Fam J; van Der Sijde JN; Karanasos A; Felix C; Diletti R; van Mieghem N; de Jaegere P; Zijlstra F; Jan van Geuns R; Regar E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 89(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 27717119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Complex Coronary Bifurcation Interventions: Insights From an In Vivo Multimodality Imaging Study.
Bennett J; Vanhaverbeke M; Vanden Driessche N; Adriaenssens T; Hiltrop N; Desmet W; Sinnaeve P; Dubois C
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 27512090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optical Coherence Tomography- Versus Angiography-Guided Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation in NSTEMI Patients.
Fallesen CO; Antonsen L; Maehara A; Noori M; Hougaard M; Hansen KN; Ellert J; Ahlehoff O; Veien KT; Lassen JF; Junker AB; Hansen HS; Jensen LO
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jul; 40():101-110. PubMed ID: 34949544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The drug-eluting resorbable magnesium vascular scaffold in complex coronary bifurcations: insights from an in vivo multimodality imaging study.
Bennett J; Vanhaverbeke M; Vanden Driessche N; Hiltrop N; Adriaenssens T; Desmet W; Sinnaeve P; Dubois C
EuroIntervention; 2018 Apr; 13(17):2036-2046. PubMed ID: 28741575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical outcomes following bifurcation double-stenting with bioresorbable scaffolds.
Tanaka A; Latib A; Kawamoto H; Jabbour RJ; Mangieri A; Pagnesi M; Montalto C; Regazzoli D; Ancona M; Chieffo A; Carlino M; Montorfano M; Colombo A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(6):854-862. PubMed ID: 27184769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-dilatation after implantation of bioresorbable everolimus- and novolimus-eluting scaffolds: an observational optical coherence tomography study of acute mechanical effects.
Blachutzik F; Boeder N; Wiebe J; Mattesini A; Dörr O; Most A; Bauer T; Röther J; Tröbs M; Schlundt C; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 106(4):271-279. PubMed ID: 27757522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized Comparison Between Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Stent: Multimodality Imaging Through 3 Years.
Onuma Y; Honda Y; Asano T; Shiomi H; Kozuma K; Ozaki Y; Namiki A; Yasuda S; Ueno T; Ando K; Furuya J; Hanaoka KI; Tanabe K; Okada K; Kitahara H; Ono M; Kusano H; Rapoza R; Simonton C; Popma JJ; Stone GW; Fitzgerald PJ; Serruys PW; Kimura T
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 13(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 31918929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optical Coherence Tomography Tissue Coverage and Characterization with Grey-Scale Signal Intensity Analysis After Bifurcation Stenting with a New Generation Bioabsorbable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent.
Rai H; Hussein H; Colleran R; Xhepa E; Wiebe J; Pinieck S; Cassese S; Joner M; Kastrati A; Byrne RA; Foley DP
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Mar; 21(3):277-285. PubMed ID: 31155492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Serial invasive imaging follow-up of the first clinical experience with the Magmaris magnesium bioresorbable scaffold.
Tovar Forero MN; van Zandvoort L; Masdjedi K; Diletti R; Wilschut J; de Jaegere PP; Zijlstra F; Van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(2):226-231. PubMed ID: 31033171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neointimal response to everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implanted at bifurcating coronary segments: insights from optical coherence tomography.
Sato T; Jose J; El-Mawardy M; Sulimov DS; Tölg R; Richardt G; Abdel-Wahab M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 27757563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Randomized Trial Comparing the NeoVas Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
Han Y; Xu B; Fu G; Wang X; Xu K; Jin C; Tao L; Li L; Hou Y; Su X; Fang Q; Chen L; Liu H; Wang B; Yuan Z; Gao C; Zhou S; Sun Z; Zhao Y; Guan C; Stone GW;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 11(3):260-272. PubMed ID: 29413240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.
Verheye S; Ormiston JA; Stewart J; Webster M; Sanidas E; Costa R; Costa JR; Chamie D; Abizaid AS; Pinto I; Morrison L; Toyloy S; Bhat V; Yan J; Abizaid A
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 24139932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Serial 5-Year Evaluation of Side Branches Jailed by Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Using 3-Dimensional Optical Coherence Tomography: Insights From the ABSORB Cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
Onuma Y; Grundeken MJ; Nakatani S; Asano T; Sotomi Y; Foin N; Ng J; Okamura T; Wykrzykowska JJ; de Winter RJ; van Geuns RJ; Koolen J; Christiansen EH; Whitbourn R; McClean D; Smits P; Windecker S; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 28893770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Healing responses after bifurcation stenting with the dedicated TRYTON Side-Branch Stent™ in combination with XIENCE-V™ stents: a clinical, angiography, fractional flow reserve, and optical coherence tomography study: the PYTON (Prospective evaluation of the TRYTON Side-Branch Stent™ with an additional XIENCE-v™ everolimus-eluting stent in coronary bifurcation lesions) study.
Dubois C; Adriaenssens T; Ughi G; Wiyono S; Bennett J; Coosemans M; Ferdinande B; Sinnaeve P; D'hooge J; Desmet W
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):E155-64. PubMed ID: 22745031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In-scaffold restenosis in a previous left main bifurcation lesion treated with bioresorbable scaffold v-stenting.
Miyazaki T; Panoulas VF; Sato K; Kawamoto H; Naganuma T; Latib A; Colombo A
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 25499306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
