112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34967526)
1. A Comparative Assessment of Scars Resulting From Skin Grafts in Facial Defects.
Seo DH; Shin JY; Roh SG; Chang SC; Lee NH
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jan-Feb 01; 33(1):303-306. PubMed ID: 34967526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical and aesthetic outcomes following radial forearm free flap transfer: comparison of ipsilateral full-thickness skin graft and traditional split-thickness skin graft.
Al-Aroomi MA; Mashrah MA; Al-Worafi NA; Zhou W; Sun C; Pan C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Feb; 53(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 37244863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of a multilayered acellular dermal substitute with simultaneous full-thickness skin graft for the one-stage coverage of nasal skin defects.
You HJ; Choi YS; Kim DW
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 19(11):3014-3019. PubMed ID: 32100416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Demographic characteristics and outcome of burn patients requiring skin grafts: a tertiary hospital experience.
Shlash SO; Madani JO; Deib JI; Alsubhi FS; Saifi SS; Helmi AM; Al-Mutairi SK; Khurram JA
Int J Burns Trauma; 2016; 6(2):30-6. PubMed ID: 27335695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the outcomes of split thickness skin graft versus thickness skin graft for closure of the radial forearm free flap donor site: A systematic review.
Mosquera C; Weyh A; Malik M; Fernandes R; Bunnell A; Nedrud S
Microsurgery; 2024 Jan; 44(1):e31126. PubMed ID: 37990820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human hypertrophic scar-like nude mouse model: characterization of the molecular and cellular biology of the scar process.
Wang J; Ding J; Jiao H; Honardoust D; Momtazi M; Shankowsky HA; Tredget EE
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(2):274-85. PubMed ID: 21362096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Full-Thickness Skin Graft according to Surrounding Relaxed Skin Tension Line Improves Scar Quality in Facial Defect Coverage: A Retrospective Comparative Study.
Shin J; Jang U; Baek SO; Lee JY
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():7398090. PubMed ID: 34568495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glyaderm(®) dermal substitute: clinical application and long-term results in 55 patients.
Pirayesh A; Hoeksema H; Richters C; Verbelen J; Monstrey S
Burns; 2015 Feb; 41(1):132-44. PubMed ID: 24946965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of Suprathel(®) in deep dermal burns: first results of a prospective study.
Keck M; Selig HF; Lumenta DB; Kamolz LP; Mittlböck M; Frey M
Burns; 2012 May; 38(3):388-95. PubMed ID: 22078803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Full-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Split-Thickness Skin Graft for Radial Forearm Free Flap Transfer in Oral Cavity Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Saleki M; Noor MA; Hurt P; Abul A
Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49279. PubMed ID: 38143661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective and Subjective Comparisons of Split Thickness Skin Graft and Full Thickness Skin Graft for Radial Forearm Flap Donor Sites Using a New Measuring Method.
Peters F; Smit N; Möhlhenrich SC; Bock A; Kniha K; Raith S; Hölzle F; Modabber A
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 32(6):e594-e598. PubMed ID: 34054091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of functional and aesthetic outcomes of retroauricular full thickness versus plantar glabrous split thickness skin grafts in pediatric palmar hand burns.
Elrod J; Moellmeier D; Schiestl C; Mohr C; Neuhaus K
Burns; 2020 May; 46(3):639-646. PubMed ID: 31610896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Involvement of keratinocyte activation phase in cutaneous graft healing: comparison of full-thickness and split-thickness skin grafts.
Yamaguchi Y; Hosokawa K; Kawai K; Inoue K; Mizuno K; Takagi S; Ohyama T; Haramoto U; Yoshikawa K; Itami S
Dermatol Surg; 2000 May; 26(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10816236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No difference between split-thickness and full-thickness skin grafts for surgical repair in adult acquired buried penis regarding surgical and functional outcomes: a comparative retrospective analysis.
Gül M; Plamadeala N; Falcone M; Preto M; Cirigliano L; Peretti F; Ferro I; Scavone M; Gontero P
Int J Impot Res; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38326548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immunohistochemical Analysis of Postburn Scars following Treatment Using Dermal Substitutes.
Lee MY; Kim H; Kwak IS; Jang Y; Choi Y
Anal Cell Pathol (Amst); 2022; 2022():3686863. PubMed ID: 35251908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coverage of radial forearm flap donor site with full thickness skin graft and Matriderm®: An alternative reliable solution?
Cristofari S; Guenane Y; Atlan M; Hallier A; Revol M; Stivala A
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2020 Jun; 65(3):213-218. PubMed ID: 31445777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of full-thickness skin graft and punch grafting in the reconstruction of plantar defects.
Lee SG; Nam KA; Oh BH; Chung KY; Roh MR
J Dermatol; 2024 Jan; 51(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 37929298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Observation on the clinical application effects of skin distractor on the treatment of scars].
Gui WL; Yang E; Zhang HS
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 33(3):139-144. PubMed ID: 28316162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Burn Scar Evaluation Using the Cutometer® MPA 580 in Comparison to "Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale" and "Vancouver Scar Scale".
Busche MN; Thraen AJ; Gohritz A; Rennekampff HO; Vogt PM
J Burn Care Res; 2018 Jun; 39(4):516-526. PubMed ID: 29596600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
