These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34968401)

  • 1. Comparison of the most likely low-emission electricity production systems in Estonia.
    Baird ZS; Neshumayev D; Järvik O; Powell KM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261780. PubMed ID: 34968401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants.
    Rubin ES; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3076-84. PubMed ID: 22332665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydro, wind and solar power as a base for a 100% renewable energy supply for South and Central America.
    Barbosa LS; Bogdanov D; Vainikka P; Breyer C
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173820. PubMed ID: 28329023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electricity system based on 100% renewable energy for India and SAARC.
    Gulagi A; Choudhary P; Bogdanov D; Breyer C
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180611. PubMed ID: 28723937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subsidizing Grid-Based Electrolytic Hydrogen Will Increase Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Coal Dominated Power Systems.
    Peng L; Guo Y; Liu S; He G; Mauzerall DL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 58(12):5187-5195. PubMed ID: 38490225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of cost efficiencies of nuclear power and renewable energy generation in mitigating CO
    Kim HS
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jan; 28(1):789-795. PubMed ID: 32820449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economical and environmental impacts of decarbonisation of Indonesian power sector.
    Indra Al Irsyad M; Halog A; Nepal R; Koesrindartoto DP
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 259():109669. PubMed ID: 32072944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of carbon footprint effect of renewable power plants regarding energy production: A case study of a city in Turkey.
    Kerem A
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2022 Mar; 72(3):294-307. PubMed ID: 35030055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.
    Whittington HW
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1653-68. PubMed ID: 12460490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power to gas: an option for 2060 high penetration rate of renewable energy scenario of China.
    Zhang Y; Zhang X; Feng S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(5):6857-6870. PubMed ID: 34460086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Switch: a planning tool for power systems with large shares of intermittent renewable energy.
    Fripp M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jun; 46(11):6371-8. PubMed ID: 22506835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sourcing of Steam and Electricity for Carbon Capture Retrofits.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 51(21):12908-12917. PubMed ID: 28968494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A case study of Australia's emissions reduction policies - An electricity planner's perspective.
    Byrom S; Bongers GD; Dargusch P; Garnett A; Boston A
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Dec; 276():111323. PubMed ID: 32932067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unintended consequences of COVID-19 public policy responses on renewable energy power: evidence from OECD countries in the EU.
    Li Y; Meng Y; Zhong H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):46503-46526. PubMed ID: 36717418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation.
    Heath GA; O'Donoughue P; Arent DJ; Bazilian M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Aug; 111(31):E3167-76. PubMed ID: 25049378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexing with lines or pipes: Techno-economic comparison of renewable electricity import options for European research facilities.
    Hampp J
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0292892. PubMed ID: 38330055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sustainable energy towards air pollution and climate change mitigation.
    Adedeji AR; Zaini F; Mathew S; Dagar L; Petra MI; De Silva LC
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 260():109978. PubMed ID: 32090795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Options for near-term phaseout of CO(2) emissions from coal use in the United States.
    Kharecha PA; Kutscher CF; Hansen JE; Mazria E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(11):4050-62. PubMed ID: 20429611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-Resolved Cost Analysis of Natural Gas Power Plant Conversion to Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage to Support Net-Zero Emissions.
    Sproul E; Barlow J; Quinn JC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 54(23):15338-15346. PubMed ID: 33183006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.