These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34968630)
1. Evaluation of the predictivity of Acute Oral Toxicity (AOT) structure-activity relationship models. Gromek K; Hawkins W; Dunn Z; Gawlik M; Ballabio D Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Mar; 129():105109. PubMed ID: 34968630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The application of acute oral toxicity computational models in dangerous goods classification. Moudgal C; Anger LT; Muster W; Nguyen R; Melnikov F; Siramshetty VB; Graham J Toxicol Ind Health; 2023 Dec; 39(12):687-699. PubMed ID: 37860984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The performance, reliability and potential application of in silico models for predicting the acute oral toxicity of pharmaceutical compounds. Graham JC; Rodas M; Hillegass J; Schulze G Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Feb; 119():104816. PubMed ID: 33166621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cross-industry collaboration to assess if acute oral toxicity (Q)SAR models are fit-for-purpose for GHS classification and labelling. Bercu J; Masuda-Herrera MJ; Trejo-Martin A; Hasselgren C; Lord J; Graham J; Schmitz M; Milchak L; Owens C; Lal SH; Robinson RM; Whalley S; Bellion P; Vuorinen A; Gromek K; Hawkins WA; van de Gevel I; Vriens K; Kemper R; Naven R; Ferrer P; Myatt GJ Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Mar; 120():104843. PubMed ID: 33340644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of in silico model predictions for mammalian acute oral toxicity and regulatory application in pesticide hazard and risk assessment. Bishop PL; Mansouri K; Eckel WP; Lowit MB; Allen D; Blankinship A; Lowit AB; Harwood DE; Johnson T; Kleinstreuer NC Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 May; 149():105614. PubMed ID: 38574841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of the GHS Mixtures Equation for Predicting Acute Oral Toxicity. Hamm J; Allen D; Ceger P; Flint T; Lowit A; O'Dell L; Tao J; Kleinstreuer N Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105007. PubMed ID: 34298086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation study on the Ocular Irritection assay for eye irritation testing. Eskes C; Hoffmann S; Facchini D; Ulmer R; Wang A; Flego M; Vassallo M; Bufo M; van Vliet E; d'Abrosca F; Wilt N Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Aug; 28(5):1046-65. PubMed ID: 24637247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The inhibition of adipogenesis via an in vitro assay can reduce animal use by more precisely estimating the starting dose for the acute toxic class method. Abud APR; Kuligovski C; Corrêa NCR; de Moraes ECP; Caruso RRB; Schuck DC; Brohem CA; Dallagiovanna B; de Aguiar AM Toxicol Lett; 2019 Sep; 311():80-90. PubMed ID: 31029752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can acute dermal systemic toxicity tests be replaced with oral tests? A comparison of route-specific systemic toxicity and hazard classifications under the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). Moore NP; Andrew DJ; Bjerke DL; Creton S; Dreher D; Holmes T; Prieto P; Seidle T; Rowan TG Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Jun; 66(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23461858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extensive review of fish embryo acute toxicities for the prediction of GHS acute systemic toxicity categories. Scholz S; Ortmann J; Klüver N; Léonard M Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):572-9. PubMed ID: 24929227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of in silico tools for evaluating rat oral acute toxicity. Diaza RG; Manganelli S; Esposito A; Roncaglioni A; Manganaro A; Benfenati E SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 25567032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Kang Y; Jeong B; Lim DH; Lee D; Lim KM J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2021 Dec; 84(23):960-972. PubMed ID: 34328061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The estimation of acute oral toxicity (LD Noga M; Michalska A; Jurowski K Arch Toxicol; 2024 Jun; 98(6):1809-1825. PubMed ID: 38493428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consensus models to predict oral rat acute toxicity and validation on a dataset coming from the industrial context. Lunghini F; Marcou G; Azam P; Horvath D; Patoux R; Van Miert E; Varnek A SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):879-897. PubMed ID: 31607169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Second-phase validation study of short time exposure test for assessment of eye irritation potency of chemicals. Kojima H; Hayashi K; Sakaguchi H; Omori T; Otoizumi T; Sozu T; Kuwahara H; Hayashi T; Sakaguchi M; Toyoda A; Goto H; Watanabe S; Ahiko K; Nakamura T; Morimoto T Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Sep; 27(6):1855-69. PubMed ID: 23747838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity Using a Multifingerprint Similarity Approach. Alberga D; Trisciuzzi D; Mansouri K; Mangiatordi GF; Nicolotti O Toxicol Sci; 2019 Feb; 167(2):484-495. PubMed ID: 30371864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]