These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34968789)

  • 1. Recognition of gasoline in fire debris using machine learning: Part I, application of random forest, gradient boosting, support vector machine, and naïve bayes.
    Bogdal C; Schellenberg R; Höpli O; Bovens M; Lory M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Feb; 331():111146. PubMed ID: 34968789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition of gasoline in fire debris using machine learning: Part II, application of a neural network.
    Bogdal C; Schellenberg R; Lory M; Bovens M; Höpli O
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Mar; 332():111177. PubMed ID: 35065332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of acidified ignitable liquid residues in fire debris by solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry.
    Martín-Alberca C; García-Ruiz C; Delémont O
    J Sep Sci; 2015 Sep; 38(18):3218-3227. PubMed ID: 26179121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of artificial intelligence to detect gasoline in fire debris using HS-SPME-GC/MS and transfer learning.
    Huang TY; Chung Yu JC
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jul; 69(4):1222-1234. PubMed ID: 38798027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of decision tree and naïve Bayes algorithms in detecting trace residue of gasoline based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data.
    Md Ghazi MGB; Chuen Lee L; Samsudin AS; Sino H
    Forensic Sci Res; 2023 Sep; 8(3):249-255. PubMed ID: 38221967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Alkylate Components for Classifying Gasoline in Fire Debris Samples.
    Peschier LJC; Grutters MMP; Hendrikse JN
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):420-430. PubMed ID: 28556928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of an HS-MS for the detection of ignitable liquids from fire debris.
    Ferreiro-González M; Ayuso J; Álvarez JA; Palma M; Barroso CG
    Talanta; 2015 Sep; 142():150-6. PubMed ID: 26003705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Fire Suppression Agents and Weathering in the Analysis of Fire Debris by HS-MS eNose.
    Falatová B; Ferreiro-González M; Martín-Alberca C; Kačíková D; Galla Š; Palma M; G Barroso C
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jun; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 29899213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Progress toward the determination of correct classification rates in fire debris analysis II: utilizing soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA).
    Waddell EE; Williams MR; Sigman ME
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):927-35. PubMed ID: 24502629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel method based on ion mobility spectrometry sum spectrum for the characterization of ignitable liquids in fire debris.
    Aliaño-González MJ; Ferreiro-González M; Barbero GF; Palma M
    Talanta; 2019 Jul; 199():189-194. PubMed ID: 30952245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fire accelerant classification from GC-MS data of suspected arson cases using machine-learning models.
    Park C; Lee JB; Park W; Lee DK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 May; 346():111646. PubMed ID: 37001430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analytical tools for the analysis of fire debris. A review: 2008-2015.
    Martín-Alberca C; Ortega-Ojeda FE; García-Ruiz C
    Anal Chim Acta; 2016 Jul; 928():1-19. PubMed ID: 27251852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a headspace solid-phase microextraction method for the analysis of ignitable liquids in fire debris.
    Fettig I; Krüger S; Deubel JH; Werrel M; Raspe T; Piechotta C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 24329005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chemometric classification of casework arson samples based on gasoline content.
    Sinkov NA; Sandercock PM; Harynuk JJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Feb; 235():24-31. PubMed ID: 24447448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination of Ignitable Liquid Residues in Burned Petroleum-Derived Substrates by Using HS-MS eNose and Chemometrics.
    Falatová B; Ferreiro-González M; P Calle JL; Álvarez JÁ; Palma M
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33530319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid GC-MS as a Screening Tool for Forensic Fire Debris Analysis.
    Capistran BA; Sisco E
    Forensic Chem; 2022 Sep; 30():. PubMed ID: 36733494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evaluation of the extent of transporting or "tracking" an identifiable ignitable liquid (gasoline) throughout fire scenes during the investigative process.
    Armstrong A; Babrauskas V; Holmes DL; Martin C; Powell R; Riggs S; Young LD
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jul; 49(4):741-8. PubMed ID: 15317188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of an untargeted chemometric approach for the source inference of ignitable liquids in forensic science.
    de Figueiredo M; Cordella CBY; Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse D; Archer X; Bégué JM; Rutledge DN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Feb; 295():8-18. PubMed ID: 30553191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method for forensic gasoline comparison in fire debris samples: A numerical likelihood ratio system.
    Vergeer P; Hendrikse JN; Grutters MMP; Peschier LJC
    Sci Justice; 2020 Sep; 60(5):438-450. PubMed ID: 32873384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study of the Weathering Process of Gasoline by eNose.
    Aliaño-González MJ; Ferreiro-González M; Barbero GF; Ayuso J; Palma M; Barroso CG
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 29304020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.