148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34970099)
1. Prostatic Schwannoma Presenting with Prostate-specific Antigen Elevation: A Case Report.
Lai BCH; Shih HJ; Syu SH; Lin KH
Yale J Biol Med; 2021 Dec; 94(4):609-612. PubMed ID: 34970099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma: the yield of serum prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography.
Ellis WJ; Chetner MP; Preston SD; Brawer MK
J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 1):1520-5. PubMed ID: 7523710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Schwannoma of the prostate: ultrasonographic features.
Francica G; Bellini S; Miragliuolo A
Eur Radiol; 2003 Aug; 13(8):2046-8. PubMed ID: 12942306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of rectal examination, prostatic massage, ultrasonography and needle biopsy on serum prostate specific antigen levels.
Yuan JJ; Coplen DE; Petros JA; Figenshau RS; Ratliff TL; Smith DS; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 1992 Mar; 147(3 Pt 2):810-4. PubMed ID: 1371553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The risks of prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound guide biopsy in Thai men with abnormal prostatic-specific antigen or abnormal digital rectal examination.
Leewansangtong S; Tantiwong A; Ratanarapee S; Nualyong C; Soontrapa S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Dec; 83(12):1519-24. PubMed ID: 11253893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancer.
Flanigan RC; Catalona WJ; Richie JP; Ahmann FR; Hudson MA; Scardino PT; DeKernion JB; Ratliff TL; Kavoussi LR; Dalkin BL; Waters WB; MacFarlane MT; Southwick PC
J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 1):1506-9. PubMed ID: 7523707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Digital Rectal Examination and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of 6,630 Men.
Catalona WJ; Richie JP; Ahmann FR; Hudson MA; Scardino PT; Flanigan RC; DeKernion JB; Ratliff TL; Kavoussi LR; Dalkin BL; Waters WB; MacFarlane MT; Southwick PC
J Urol; 2017 Feb; 197(2S):S200-S207. PubMed ID: 28012755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The significance of focal hypoechoic lesions in the peripheral zone of the prostate].
Oyen R; Van Popel H; Van de Voorde W; Knapen P; Ameye F; Baert AL; Baert LV
J Belge Radiol; 1995 Dec; 78(6):356-8. PubMed ID: 8576025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of ultrasound in prostate cancer detection in patients with an elevated prostate specific antigen level but no prostatic nodule.
Sanders RC
Md Med J; 1993 Oct; 42(10):1007-11. PubMed ID: 7505045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Role of ultrasonography-guided prostatic biopsy of hypoechoic areas associated with systematic biopsies in patients with normal and high PSA levels].
Scattoni V; Roscigno M; Raber M; Consonni P; Freschi M; Montorsi F; Pasta A; Colombo R; Nava L; Bua L; Rigatti P
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2002 Dec; 74(4):273-5. PubMed ID: 12508749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stratification of prostate-specific antigen level and results of transrectal ultrasonography and digital rectal examination as predictors of positive prostate biopsy.
Clark TW; Goldenberg L; Cooperberg PL; Wong AD; Singer J
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1997 Aug; 48(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 9282157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate volume is strongest predictor of cancer diagnosis at transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy with prostate-specific antigen values between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/mL.
Al-Azab R; Toi A; Lockwood G; Kulkarni GS; Fleshner N
Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 17270628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidental carcinoma of the prostate.
van Andel G; Vleeming R; Kurth K; de Reijke TM
Semin Surg Oncol; 1995; 11(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 7538693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate cancer detection at low prostate specific antigen.
Schröder FH; van der Cruijsen-Koeter I; de Koning HJ; Vis AN; Hoedemaeker RF; Kranse R
J Urol; 2000 Mar; 163(3):806-12. PubMed ID: 10687982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for prostatic carcinoma with prostate specific antigen.
Brawer MK; Chetner MP; Beatie J; Buchner DM; Vessella RL; Lange PH
J Urol; 1992 Mar; 147(3 Pt 2):841-5. PubMed ID: 1371559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of prostate specific antigen density and transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in 100 consecutive patients with a negative digital rectal examination and intermediate serum prostate specific antigen levels.
Tarcan T; Ozveri H; Biren T; Türkeri L; Akdas A
Int J Urol; 1997 Jul; 4(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 9256325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer.
Catalona WJ; Smith DS; Ratliff TL; Dodds KM; Coplen DE; Yuan JJ; Petros JA; Andriole GL
N Engl J Med; 1991 Apr; 324(17):1156-61. PubMed ID: 1707140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Yield of ultrasonography-guided transrectal biopsy in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate].
Fernández González I; Ruiz Rubio JL; Llorente Abarca C; Aramburu González JA; Montes Díaz MJ; Herrero Payo A; Sánchez Sánchez E; Berenguer Sánchez A
Arch Esp Urol; 1995; 48(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 7544968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experience with an assay for prostate-specific antigen and transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Heman-Ackah CA; Festenstein JB; Hibbert P; Harvey DJ; Bunce CJ; Gelister JS
Br J Urol; 1997 Mar; 79(3):439-44. PubMed ID: 9117228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.
Catalona WJ; Richie JP; Ahmann FR; Hudson MA; Scardino PT; Flanigan RC; DeKernion JB; Ratliff TL; Kavoussi LR; Dalkin BL; Waters WB; MacFarlane MT; Southwick PC
J Urol; 1994 May; 151(5):1283-90. PubMed ID: 7512659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
