147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34970099)
21. MR imaging evaluation with a transrectal surface coil of local recurrence of prostatic cancer in men who have undergone radical prostatectomy.
Silverman JM; Krebs TL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 9016212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of serum prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography.
Tsui KH; Chang PL; Wang TM; Hsieh ML
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Mar; 20(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 9178589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of transrectal ultrasonography on the palpable and impalpable abnormal prostate.
Tzai TS; Lin JS; Yeh YC; Chow NH
Eur Urol; 1995; 27(2):142-5. PubMed ID: 7538084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Role of rectal exploration, suprapubic and transrectal prostatic ultrasonography, and PSA in the diagnosis and follow-up of prostatic carcinoma].
Speranza I; Bianco V; Banci M; Muià R; Gianni W; Bacciu O; Vecchione A; Marchei P
Minerva Med; 1998; 89(7-8):267-75. PubMed ID: 9824988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical significance of small (less than 0.2 cm3) hypoechoic lesions in men with normal digital rectal examinations and prostate-specific antigen levels less than 10 ng/mL.
Fleshner NE; O'Sullivan M; Premdass C; Fair WR
Urology; 1999 Feb; 53(2):356-8. PubMed ID: 9933054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Systematic ultrasound guided transrectal core prostate biopsy based on serum level of prostate-specific antigen].
Yamaguchi S; Baba Y; Naito K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1997 Sep; 43(9):641-5. PubMed ID: 9365843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Early diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma by random biopsies in 60 patients clinically negative but with PSA greater than 8.9 ng/ml].
Bianchi A; Bottanelli A; Baroni G; Rovellini P; Sciaraffia G; Toia G; Marcelli G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 1997 Dec; 69(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 9477617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Usefulness of digital rectal examination, serum prostate-specific antigen, transrectal ultrasonography and systematic prostate biopsy for the detection of organ-confined prostate cancer.
Gohji K; Okamoto M; Morisue K; Fujii A
Int J Urol; 1995 May; 2(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 7553283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Incidental periprostatic schwannoma discovered during evaluation for prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Dietrick B; Friedes C; White MJ; Allaf ME; Meyer AR
Urol Case Rep; 2020 Jul; 31():101150. PubMed ID: 32154115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost-effective prostate cancer detection. Reduction of low-yield biopsies. Investigators of the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project.
Littrup PJ; Kane RA; Mettlin CJ; Murphy GP; Lee F; Toi A; Badalament R; Babaian R
Cancer; 1994 Dec; 74(12):3146-58. PubMed ID: 7526969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Diagnostic algorithm based on a multivariate model to reduce the percentage of negative prostatic biopsies in patients with changed PSA or suspicious rectal palpation].
Valer Algarabel J; Agüera Fernández L; Adot Zurbano JM; Virseda Chamorro M; Marcos Díez J; Gómez López A; Alpuente Román C
Actas Urol Esp; 2000; 24(7):549-59. PubMed ID: 11011445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [The role of the absolute value and "density" of the prostate-specific antigen estimated echographically in the selection of patients to undergo a biopsy in suspected prostatic carcinoma. A comparison between PSA, palpation and echography in 95 patients undergoing echo-guided endorectal prostatic biopsy].
Di Donna A; Bazzocchi M; Guerra UP; Bendini M; De Biasi F; Caminiti F; Delendi M
Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):84-9. PubMed ID: 7683136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The value of prostate specific antigen and transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in detecting prostatic fossa recurrences following radical prostatectomy.
Foster LS; Jajodia P; Fournier G; Shinohara K; Carroll P; Narayan P
J Urol; 1993 May; 149(5):1024-8. PubMed ID: 7683341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Relation of age and prostatic volume to cancer detection in prostatic biopsies from patients with non-suspect rectal palpation].
Herranz Amo F; Verdú Tartajo F; Díez Cordero JM; Subira Ríos D; Castaño González I; Moralejo Gárate M; Martínez Salamanca JI; Cabello Benavente R
Arch Esp Urol; 2003 May; 56(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 12830608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Characteristics of screening detected prostate cancer in men 50 to 66 years old with 3 to 4 ng./ml. Prostate specific antigen.
Lodding P; Aus G; Bergdahl S; Frösing R; Lilja H; Pihl CG; Hugosson J
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):899-903. PubMed ID: 9474178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is transrectal ultrasonography needed to rule out prostatic cancer with normal findings at digital rectal examination and normal serum prostate-specific antigen?
Simak R; Eisenmenger M; Hainz A; Kratzik C; Marberger M
Eur Urol; 1993; 24(4):474-8. PubMed ID: 7507047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: clinical relevance of tumor size, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen.
Lee F; Torp-Pedersen S; Littrup PJ; McLeary RD; McHugh TA; Smid AP; Stella PJ; Borlaza GS
Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):29-32. PubMed ID: 2462262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of digital rectal examination, flexible cystoscopy and prostatic biopsy on free and total prostate specific antigen, and the free-to-total prostate specific antigen ratio in clinical practice.
Collins GN; Martin PJ; Wynn-Davies A; Brooman PJ; O'Reilly PH
J Urol; 1997 May; 157(5):1744-7. PubMed ID: 9112518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
