189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34971615)
61. Advances in contraception: new options for postpartum women.
Taub RL; Jensen JT
Expert Opin Pharmacother; 2017 May; 18(7):677-688. PubMed ID: 28375776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Association of the affordable care act Medicaid expansions with postpartum contraceptive use and early postpartum pregnancy.
Eliason EL; Spishak-Thomas A; Steenland MW
Contraception; 2022 Sep; 113():42-48. PubMed ID: 35259409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding.
Ireland LD; Goyal V; Raker CA; Murray A; Allen RH
Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 24973904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Review of Insertion and Device Reimbursement Policies.
Kroelinger CD; Okoroh EM; Uesugi K; Romero L; Sappenfield OR; Howland JF; Cox S
Womens Health Issues; 2021; 31(6):523-531. PubMed ID: 34602326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the United States, 2008-2013.
Moniz MH; Chang T; Heisler M; Admon L; Gebremariam A; Dalton VK; Davis MM
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 129(6):1078-1085. PubMed ID: 28486357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive utilization after a statewide contraceptive access initiative.
McColl R; Gifford K; McDuffie MJ; Boudreaux M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 228(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 36565901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Implementing best practices for the provision of long-acting reversible contraception: a survey of obstetrician-gynecologists.
Castleberry NM; Stark L; Schulkin J; Grossman D
Contraception; 2019 Aug; 100(2):123-127. PubMed ID: 30981843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Role of Bridge Contraception in Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization Fulfillment Rates.
Montague M; Ascha M; Wilkinson B; Verbus E; Morris J; Mercer BM; Arora KS
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 132(3):583-590. PubMed ID: 30095782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Application of Implementation Science Methodology to Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Policy Roll-Out Across States.
Rankin KM; Kroelinger CD; DeSisto CL; Pliska E; Akbarali S; Mackie CN; Goodman DA
Matern Child Health J; 2016 Nov; 20(Suppl 1):173-179. PubMed ID: 27085341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Women's informed choice and satisfaction with immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception in Georgia.
DeSisto CL; Handler A; Haider S; Caskey R; Peacock N; Kottke M; Rankin K
Contracept Reprod Med; 2018; 3():19. PubMed ID: 30524752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Short Interpregnancy Intervals: Results from the First Baby Study.
Masinter LM; Dina B; Kjerulff K; Feinglass J
Womens Health Issues; 2017; 27(4):426-433. PubMed ID: 28410974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Choice of Postpartum Contraception: Factors Predisposing Pregnant Adolescents to Choose Less Effective Methods Over Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.
Chacko MR; Wiemann CM; Buzi RS; Kozinetz CA; Peskin M; Smith PB
J Adolesc Health; 2016 Jun; 58(6):628-35. PubMed ID: 26852250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Postpartum contraception: a missed opportunity to prevent unintended pregnancy and short inter-pregnancy intervals.
Heller R; Cameron S; Briggs R; Forson N; Glasier A
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2016 Apr; 42(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 26645197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Immediate versus delayed postpartum use of levonorgestrel contraceptive implants: a randomized controlled trial in Uganda.
Averbach S; Kakaire O; Kayiga H; Lester F; Sokoloff A; Byamugisha J; Dehlendorf C; Steinauer J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):568.e1-568.e7. PubMed ID: 28610898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Obtaining buy-in for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception programs in Texas hospitals: A qualitative study.
Hopkins K; Remington C; Eilers MA; Rivas SD; Wallace Huff C; Moore LD; Hampton RM; Ogburn T
Contraception; 2022 Apr; 108():32-36. PubMed ID: 34748748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Long-acting reversible contraception in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Diedrich JT; Klein DA; Peipert JF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):364.e1-364.e12. PubMed ID: 28038902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Catholic sole community hospitals are associated with decreased receipt of postpartum permanent contraception among Medicaid recipients.
Rodriguez MI; Daly A; Meath T; Watson K; McConnell KJ
Contraception; 2023 Jun; 122():109959. PubMed ID: 36708859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Exposure to routine availability of immediate postpartum LARC: effect on attitudes and practices of labor and delivery and postpartum nurses.
Benfield N; Hawkins F; Ray L; McGowan A; Floyd K; Africa D; Barreto M; Levi E
Contraception; 2018 May; 97(5):411-414. PubMed ID: 29428850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Motivational interviewing to promote long-acting reversible contraception among Rwandan couples wishing to prevent or delay pregnancy.
Mukamuyango J; Ingabire R; Parker R; Nyombayire J; Easter SR; Wall KM; Tichacek A; Nyirazinyoye L; Kaslow N; Allen S; Karita E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4S):S919.e1-S919.e12. PubMed ID: 31838122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The effect of an educational video on long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) utilization at 6-8 weeks postpartum period: a randomized controlled trial.
Burapasikarin C; Manonai J; Wattanayingcharoenchai R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1503-1509. PubMed ID: 32734413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
