209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34971829)
1. Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 2D Operative Video.
Gagliardi M; Guiroy A; Sícoli A; Masanés NG; Ciancio AM; Asghar J
World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():107. PubMed ID: 34971829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical outcomes of modified lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kanbara S; Yukawa Y; Ito K; Machino M; Kato F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 25594729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel surgical approach to the lumbar spine involving hemilateral split-off of the spinous process to preserve the multifidus muscle: technical note.
Chatani K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 26544596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcome of microscopic lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy: clinical article.
Nomura H; Yanagisawa Y; Arima J; Oga M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 24878270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical analysis of two-level compression of the cauda equina and the nerve roots in lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Sato K; Kikuchi S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Aug; 22(16):1898-903; discussion 1904. PubMed ID: 9280027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note.
Watanabe K; Hosoya T; Shiraishi T; Matsumoto M; Chiba K; Toyama Y
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Nov; 3(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 16302638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical assessment of minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a cadaver study.
Hamasaki T; Tanaka N; Kim J; Okada M; Ochi M; Hutton WC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Oct; 22(7):486-91. PubMed ID: 20075811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiological Analysis of Minimally Invasive Microscopic Laminectomy for Lumbar Canal Stenosis with a Focus on Multilevel Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis.
Awaya T; Nishimura Y; Eguchi K; Nagashima Y; Ando R; Akahori S; Yoshikawa S; Haimoto S; Hara M; Takayasu M; Saito R
World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e224-e234. PubMed ID: 35483569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spinous process splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a critical appraisal.
Lee DY; Lee SH
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Aug; 51(4):204-7. PubMed ID: 18683110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis by Microscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression: A Technical Note.
Phan K; Teng I; Schultz K; Mobbs RJ
Orthop Surg; 2017 May; 9(2):241-246. PubMed ID: 28547809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of Spinous Process Splitting Decompression Compared with Conventional Laminectomy for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis.
Ovalioglu TC; Ozdemir Ovalioglu A; Canaz G; Gunes M; Babur M; Emel E
World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e1233-e1242. PubMed ID: 35691518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients.
Rajasekaran S; Thomas A; Kanna RM; Prasad Shetty A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):1737-43. PubMed ID: 23797498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical outcomes of decompressive laminectomy by transspinous approach for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ücer M; Aydin I; Tacyildiz AE; Dogan I; Emel E
J Pak Med Assoc; 2018 Nov; 68(11):1618-1624. PubMed ID: 30410142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploration and decompression of the spinal canal using split laminotomy and its modification, the "archbone" technique.
Banczerowski P; Vajda J; Veres R
Neurosurgery; 2008 May; 62(5 Suppl 2):ONS432-40; discussion ONS440-1. PubMed ID: 18596526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Minimally invasive cervical elastic laminoplasty - principles and surgical technique].
Suchomel P; Hradil J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 22094158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression.
Soliman HM
Spine J; 2015 Oct; 15(10):2282-9. PubMed ID: 26165475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
