211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34971829)
21. Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Results and Radiologic Changes Between Two Different Minimally Invasive Decompressive Surgical Methods for Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Lumbar Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy and Trans-Interspinous Lumbar Decompression.
Tanaka S; Wada K; Kumagai G; Asari T; Aburakawa S; Yamasaki Y; Yokoyama T; Takeuchi K; Ishibashi Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Nov; 46(21):E1136-E1145. PubMed ID: 33813582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.
Watanabe K; Matsumoto M; Ikegami T; Nishiwaki Y; Tsuji T; Ishii K; Ogawa Y; Takaishi H; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Chiba K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 21142464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Facet-sparing lumbar decompression with a minimally invasive flexible MicroBlade Shaver® versus traditional decompression: quantitative radiographic assessment.
Lauryssen C; Berven S; Mimran R; Summa C; Sheinberg M; Miller LE; Block JE
Clin Interv Aging; 2012; 7():257-66. PubMed ID: 22879740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Restoration of the Spinous Process Following Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process.
Wi SM; Lee HJ; Chang SY; Kwon OH; Lee CK; Chang BS; Kim H
Clin Orthop Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 30838113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spinal canal enlargement procedure by restorative laminoplasty for the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis.
Adachi K; Futami T; Ebihara A; Yamaya T; Kasai N; Nakazawa T; Imura T
Spine J; 2003; 3(6):471-8. PubMed ID: 14609692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Spinal canal morphology and clinical outcomes of microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Choi WS; Oh CH; Ji GY; Shin SC; Lee JB; Park DH; Cho TH
Eur Spine J; 2014 May; 23(5):991-8. PubMed ID: 24292345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Laminoplasty: A Novel Technique for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.
Baghdadi YM; Moussallem CD; Shuaib MA; Clarke MJ; Dekutoski MB; Nassr AN
Orthopedics; 2016 Sep; 39(5):e950-6. PubMed ID: 27337665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest G; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Jacobs W; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2244-63. PubMed ID: 26184719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Bilateral "over the top" decompression through unilateral laminotomy for lumbar and thoracic spinal canal stenosis].
Banczerowski P; Lipóth L; Veres R
Ideggyogy Sz; 2007 Nov; 60(11-12):467-73. PubMed ID: 18198793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the results of operative management of lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Islam MS; Ara R; Salam MA; Rahman MW; Alam MJ; Karim MR; Rahman M; Alam MN; Hussain MF
Mymensingh Med J; 2013 Oct; 22(4):676-83. PubMed ID: 24292296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Decompression of lumbar canal stenosis with a bilateral interlaminar versus classic laminectomy technique: a prospective randomized study.
Soliman MAR; Ali A
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E3. PubMed ID: 31042649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome - an experimental study in porcine model.
Tai CL; Hsieh PH; Chen WP; Chen LH; Chen WJ; Lai PL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Jun; 9():84. PubMed ID: 18547409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modified fenestration with restorative spinoplasty for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Matsudaira K; Yamazaki T; Seichi A; Hoshi K; Hara N; Ogiwara S; Terayama S; Chikuda H; Takeshita K; Nakamura K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jun; 10(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 19558293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Clinical experiences.
Spetzger U; Bertalanffy H; Reinges MH; Gilsbach JM
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1997; 139(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 9204107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of 3 Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Rekeland F; Brox JI; Franssen E; Weber C; Solberg TK; Furunes H; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e224291. PubMed ID: 35344046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three cases of L4-5 Baastrup's disease due to L5-S1 spondylolytic spondylolisthesis.
Seo JS; Lee SH; Keum HJ; Eun SS
Eur Spine J; 2017 May; 26(Suppl 1):186-191. PubMed ID: 28357587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Microsurgical decompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Mayer HM; Korge A
Eur Spine J; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1989-1990. PubMed ID: 19937063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Minimally invasive decompression techniques for spinal cord stenosis].
Korge A; Mehren C; Ruetten S
Orthopade; 2019 Oct; 48(10):824-830. PubMed ID: 31053867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
