BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34973856)

  • 1. Oncologic outcomes of organ-confined Gleason grade group 4-5 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
    Preisser F; Wang N; Abrams-Pompe RS; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 40(4):161.e9-161.e14. PubMed ID: 34973856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Persistent Prostate-Specific Antigen After Radical Prostatectomy and Its Impact on Oncologic Outcomes.
    Preisser F; Chun FKH; Pompe RS; Heinze A; Salomon G; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
    Eur Urol; 2019 Jul; 76(1):106-114. PubMed ID: 30772034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and tumor volume predict adverse pathological stage and margin status at radical prostatectomy in grade Group 2 and grade Group 3 prostate cancers.
    Iakymenko OA; Lugo I; Briski LM; Nemov I; Punnen S; Kwon D; Pollack A; Stoyanova R; Parekh DJ; Jorda M; Gonzalgo ML; Kryvenko ON
    Prostate; 2021 Sep; 81(12):866-873. PubMed ID: 34184782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oncological outcomes of pathologically organ-confined, lymph node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
    Stolzenbach LF; Knipper S; Mandel P; Ascalone L; Deuker M; Tian Z; Heinzer H; Tilki D; Maurer T; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Steuber T
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Apr; 39(4):234.e1-234.e7. PubMed ID: 33097398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy on cancer-specific mortality in high/very high-risk prostate cancer patients with Gleason Grade Group 4-5.
    Panunzio A; Sorce G; Hoeh B; Hohenhorst L; Tappero S; Nimer N; Rajwa P; Tian Z; Terrone C; Chun FKH; Briganti A; Saad F; Shariat SF; Cerruto MA; Antonelli A; Karakiewicz PI
    Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(3):268-276. PubMed ID: 36336728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Hashimoto T; Nakashima J; Inoue R; Komori O; Yamaguchi Y; Kashima T; Satake N; Nakagami Y; Namiki K; Nagao T; Ohno Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 25(2):377-383. PubMed ID: 31673831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Controlled for Tumor Grade, Stage, and Margin Status Does Not Independently Influence the Likelihood of Biochemical Recurrence in Localized Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Kryvenko ON; Iakymenko OA; De Lima Guido LP; Bhattu AS; Merhe A; Mouzannar A; Briski LM; Oymagil I; Lugo I; Nemov I; Ritch CR; Kava BR; Punnen S; Jorda M; Parekh DJ; Gonzalgo ML
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Aug; 146(8):1012-1017. PubMed ID: 34739539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term Impact of Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in pT3N0 Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Multi-institutional Series.
    Fossati N; Karnes RJ; Boorjian SA; Moschini M; Morlacco A; Bossi A; Seisen T; Cozzarini C; Fiorino C; Noris Chiorda B; Gandaglia G; Dell'Oglio P; Joniau S; Tosco L; Shariat S; Goldner G; Hinkelbein W; Bartkowiak D; Haustermans K; Tombal B; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):886-893. PubMed ID: 27484843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cancer-Specific Mortality Differences in Specimen-Confined Radical Prostatectomy Patients According to Lymph Node Invasion.
    Barletta F; Tappero S; Morra S; Incesu RB; Cano Garcia C; Piccinelli ML; Scheipner L; Baudo A; Tian Z; Gandaglia G; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Terrone C; Longo N; Tilki D; Chun FKH; de Cobelli O; Ahyai S; Carmignani L; Saad F; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2023 Dec; 21(6):e461-e466.e1. PubMed ID: 37365054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternative prostate cancer grading systems incorporating percent pattern 4/5 (IQ-Gleason) and cribriform architecture (cGrade) improve prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Seyrek N; Hollemans E; Andrinopoulou ER; Osanto S; Pelger RCM; van der Poel HG; Bekers E; Remmers S; Schoots IG; van Leenders GJLH
    Virchows Arch; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1149-1157. PubMed ID: 35157140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy.
    Pierorazio PM; Ross AE; Lin BM; Epstein JI; Han M; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Pavlovich CP; Schaeffer EM
    BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110(8):1122-8. PubMed ID: 22373045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Hruza M; Bermejo JL; Flinspach B; Schulze M; Teber D; Rumpelt HJ; Rassweiler JJ
    BJU Int; 2013 Feb; 111(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 22757970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying low cancer-specific mortality risk lymph node-positive radical prostatectomy patients.
    Barletta F; Tappero S; Morra S; Incesu RB; Cano Garcia C; Piccinelli ML; Scheipner L; Tian Z; Gandaglia G; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Terrone C; Longo N; Tilki D; Chun FKH; de Cobelli O; Ahyai S; Saad F; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI
    J Surg Oncol; 2024 Jun; 129(7):1305-1310. PubMed ID: 38470523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metastatic potential to regional lymph nodes with Gleason score ≤7, including tertiary pattern 5, at radical prostatectomy.
    Diolombi ML; Epstein JI
    BJU Int; 2017 Jun; 119(6):872-878. PubMed ID: 27496532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.