230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34973896)
41. Geisinger high-risk osteoporosis clinic (HiROC): 2013-2015 FLS performance analysis.
Dunn P; Webb D; Olenginski TP
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Feb; 29(2):451-457. PubMed ID: 29063214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Fracture liaison services in Ireland-how do we compare to international standards?
Dockery F; Glynn A; Franks K; Carey JJ; O'Gradaigh D; Kenny P; Askin D; Butler E; Sweeney B; Conlon B; McGregor B; Lannon R; Rooney B; Pillai I; Fitzgerald C
Osteoporos Int; 2022 May; 33(5):1089-1096. PubMed ID: 34981131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Fracture liaison services for osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region: current unmet needs and systematic literature review.
Chang Y-; Huang C-; Hwang J-; Kuo J-; Lin K-; Huang H-; Bagga S; Kumar A; Chen F-; Wu C-
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Apr; 29(4):779-792. PubMed ID: 29285627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effectiveness of a minimal resource fracture liaison service.
Axelsson KF; Jacobsson R; Lund D; Lorentzon M
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Nov; 27(11):3165-3175. PubMed ID: 27230521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Three-year outcomes of a fracture liaison service model at a university-based tertiary care hospital in Thailand.
Chotiyarnwong P; Kitcharanant N; Vanitcharoenkul E; Anusitviwat C; Jarusriwanna A; Suthutvoravut W; Boonnasa W; Unnanuntana A
Arch Osteoporos; 2023 Jan; 18(1):26. PubMed ID: 36692851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Establishing baseline absolute risk of subsequent fracture among adults presenting to hospital with a minimal-trauma-fracture.
Frost SA; Kelly A; Gaudin J; Evoy LM; Wilson C; Marov L; El Haddad C; Center J; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV; Hassett G
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 32111200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Incidence of fractures and clinical profile of patients following up at a Fracture Liaison Service in the city of Curitiba.
Inácio AM; Marques LLM; Borba VZC; Moreira CA
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2022 Aug; 34(8):1885-1891. PubMed ID: 35364784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Impact of osteoporosis liaison services on the expected lifetime osteoporosis-related medical expenses of patients with fragility fracture in a private hospital in Japan.
Kobayashi S; Tanaka S; Yoshino Y; Tobita H; Kuwagaki K; Fujioka R; Totsuka H; Ichiba Y; Ishimine S; Sakamoto K; Ohama H; Kubo T
Arch Osteoporos; 2022 Apr; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 35416539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Characterization of fracture liaison service non-responders after invitation by home visits and questionnaires.
van den Berg P; van Haard PMM; Geusens PP; van den Bergh JP; Schweitzer DH
Osteoporos Int; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2007-2015. PubMed ID: 32405912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Fracture liaison: A crucial tool in the fight against fragility fracture.
Mitchell PJ
Maturitas; 2022 Nov; 165():26-32. PubMed ID: 35863271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Economic evaluation of a population-based osteoporosis intervention for outpatients with non-traumatic non-hip fractures: the "Catch a Break" 1i [type C] FLS.
Majumdar SR; Lier DA; Hanley DA; Juby AG; Beaupre LA;
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jun; 28(6):1965-1977. PubMed ID: 28275838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Patients not taking a previously prescribed bone active medication now prescribed medication through Ontario FLS.
Sale JEM; Yang A; Inrig T; Gandhi S; Elliot-Gibson V; Sujic R; Jain R; Weldon J; Linton D; Bogoch E
Osteoporos Int; 2022 Nov; 33(11):2435-2440. PubMed ID: 35763074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Fracture Prevention in the Orthopaedic Environment: Outcomes of a Coordinator-Based Fracture Liaison Service.
Bogoch ER; Elliot-Gibson V; Beaton D; Sale J; Josse RG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):820-831. PubMed ID: 28509822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Fragility fracture patients with a history of prior fractures more likely to present with multiple risk factors: findings from a province-wide fracture liaison service.
Sujic R; Yang A; Ansari H; Bogoch ER; Jain R; Weldon J; Elliot-Gibson V; Sale JEM
Osteoporos Int; 2022 Aug; 33(8):1769-1774. PubMed ID: 35536327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cost Analysis of a Fracture Liaison Service: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Secondary Prevention After Fragility Fractures of the Hip.
Zinger G; Davidson A; Sylvetsky N; Levy Y; Peyser A
Endocr Pract; 2023 Oct; 29(10):794-802. PubMed ID: 37541586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The Importance of Fracture Liaison Services to the Healthcare System: A Review.
Patel S; Daniels NF; Lim JA; Zhou AK; Thahir A; Krkovic M
Curr Rheumatol Rev; 2023; 19(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 35538826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A fracture prevention service reduces further fractures two years after incident minimal trauma fracture.
Van der Kallen J; Giles M; Cooper K; Gill K; Parker V; Tembo A; Major G; Ross L; Carter J
Int J Rheum Dis; 2014 Feb; 17(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 24576275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Preventing future fractures: effectiveness of an orthogeriatric fracture liaison service compared to an outpatient fracture liaison service and the standard management in patients with hip fracture.
Naranjo A; Fernández-Conde S; Ojeda S; Torres-Hernández L; Hernández-Carballo C; Bernardos I; Rodríguez S; Laynez P
Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Dec; 12(1):112. PubMed ID: 29230540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Compliance to The Joint Commission proposed Core Measure set on osteoporosis-associated fracture: review of different secondary fracture prevention programs in an open medical system from 2010 to 2015.
Fojas MC; Southerland LT; Phieffer LS; Stephens JA; Srivastava T; Ing SW
Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Dec; 12(1):16. PubMed ID: 28155141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Patients discharged from a fracture liaison service still require follow-up and bone health advice.
Hui N; Fraser S; Wong PKK
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jul; 15(1):118. PubMed ID: 32728971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
