277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34974136)
1. A novel guided zygomatic implant surgery system compared to free hand: A human cadaver study on accuracy.
Grecchi E; Stefanelli LV; Grecchi F; Grivetto F; Franchina A; Pranno N
J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():103942. PubMed ID: 34974136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Novel Guided Zygomatic and Pterygoid Implant Surgery System: A Human Cadaver Study on Accuracy.
Grecchi F; Stefanelli LV; Grivetto F; Grecchi E; Siev R; Mazor Z; Del Fabbro M; Pranno N; Franchina A; Di Lucia V; De Angelis F; Goker F
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 34200143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants.
González Rueda JR; Galparsoro Catalán A; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy evaluation of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in zygomatic implant placement in human cadavers.
Chrcanovic BR; Oliveira DR; Custódio AL
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(5):345-55. PubMed ID: 20545538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: A randomized clinical study comparing the flapless versus the conventional approach.
Bhalerao A; Marimuthu M; Wahab A; Ayoub A
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104436. PubMed ID: 36736529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-Guided Approach for Placement of Zygomatic Implants: Novel Protocol and Surgical Guide.
Rinaldi M; Ganz SD
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 30829495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using fully guided versus partially guided tissue-supported surgical guides with cylindrical versus C-shaped guiding holes: A split-mouth clinical study.
Sarhan MM; Khamis MM; El-Sharkawy AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):620-627. PubMed ID: 32389377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Accuracy and clinical outcome of a real-time surgical navigation system for the placement of quad zygomatic implants].
Tao BX; Wang F; Shen YH; Fan SQ; Huang W; Wang YP; Wu YQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):845-850. PubMed ID: 33171557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study.
Franchina A; Stefanelli LV; Maltese F; Mandelaris GA; Vantaggiato A; Pagliarulo M; Pranno N; Brauner E; Angelis F; Carlo SD
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33542168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Navigation-Guided Quad Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
Fan S; Gielisch MW; Díaz L; Thiem DGE; Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):367-373. PubMed ID: 37083908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy evaluation of computer-guided implant surgery associated with prototyped surgical guides.
Cunha RM; Souza FÁ; Hadad H; Poli PP; Maiorana C; Carvalho PSP
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 32111393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study.
Kivovics M; Takács A; Pénzes D; Németh O; Mijiritsky E
J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104070. PubMed ID: 35183695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of computer-guided implantation in a human cadaver model.
Yatzkair G; Cheng A; Brodie S; Raviv E; Boyan BD; Schwartz Z
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1143-9. PubMed ID: 25220954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An
Aggarwal S; Aggarwal S; Goswami R; Mowar A; Tomar N; Saxena D
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(3):266-276. PubMed ID: 37929366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides.
Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computer-generated and conventional surgical guides.
Farley NE; Kennedy K; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 23527361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
