117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34974877)
1. A Retrospective Statistical Validation Approach for Panel of Normal-Based Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection in Tumor Sequencing.
Ren X; Wang J; Liu S; Deng S; Wang D; Xie Z; Chen H; Ye Y
J Mol Diagn; 2022 Jan; 24(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 34974877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. QQ-SNV: single nucleotide variant detection at low frequency by comparing the quality quantiles.
Van der Borght K; Thys K; Wetzels Y; Clement L; Verbist B; Reumers J; van Vlijmen H; Aerssens J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():379. PubMed ID: 26554718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of single nucleotide variants using position-specific error estimation in deep sequencing data.
Kleftogiannis D; Punta M; Jayaram A; Sandhu S; Wong SQ; Gasi Tandefelt D; Conteduca V; Wetterskog D; Attard G; Lise S
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Aug; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 31375105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SomatoSim: precision simulation of somatic single nucleotide variants.
Hawari MA; Hong CS; Biesecker LG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):109. PubMed ID: 33676403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the performance of low-frequency variant calling tools for the detection of variants from short-read deep sequencing data.
Xiang X; Lu B; Song D; Li J; Shu K; Pu D
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20444. PubMed ID: 37993475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GeDi: applying suffix arrays to increase the repertoire of detectable SNVs in tumour genomes.
Coleman I; Corleone G; Arram J; Ng HC; Magnani L; Luk W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):45. PubMed ID: 32024475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MiST: a new approach to variant detection in deep sequencing datasets.
Subramanian S; Di Pierro V; Shah H; Jayaprakash AD; Weisberger I; Shim J; George A; Gelb BD; Sachidanandam R
Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Sep; 41(16):e154. PubMed ID: 23828039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consensus Genotyper for Exome Sequencing (CGES): improving the quality of exome variant genotypes.
Trubetskoy V; Rodriguez A; Dave U; Campbell N; Crawford EL; Cook EH; Sutcliffe JS; Foster I; Madduri R; Cox NJ; Davis LK
Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PhredEM: a phred-score-informed genotype-calling approach for next-generation sequencing studies.
Liao P; Satten GA; Hu YJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):375-387. PubMed ID: 28560825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation and assessment of variant calling pipelines for next-generation sequencing.
Pirooznia M; Kramer M; Parla J; Goes FS; Potash JB; McCombie WR; Zandi PP
Hum Genomics; 2014 Jul; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 25078893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. VirVarSeq: a low-frequency virus variant detection pipeline for Illumina sequencing using adaptive base-calling accuracy filtering.
Verbist BM; Thys K; Reumers J; Wetzels Y; Van der Borght K; Talloen W; Aerssens J; Clement L; Thas O
Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 25178459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Longshot enables accurate variant calling in diploid genomes from single-molecule long read sequencing.
Edge P; Bansal V
Nat Commun; 2019 Oct; 10(1):4660. PubMed ID: 31604920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive benchmarking of SNV callers for highly admixed tumor data.
Bohnert R; Vivas S; Jansen G
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186175. PubMed ID: 29020110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the Calling Performance of a Rare Disease NGS Panel for Single Nucleotide and Copy Number Variants.
Cacheiro P; Ordóñez-Ugalde A; Quintáns B; Piñeiro-Hermida S; Amigo J; García-Murias M; Pascual-Pascual SI; Grandas F; Arpa J; Carracedo A; Sobrido MJ
Mol Diagn Ther; 2017 Jun; 21(3):303-313. PubMed ID: 28290094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing a few SNP calling algorithms using low-coverage sequencing data.
Yu X; Sun S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Sep; 14():274. PubMed ID: 24044377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of somatic variant detection algorithms using Ion Torrent targeted deep sequencing data.
Wang Q; Kotoula V; Hsu PC; Papadopoulou K; Ho JWK; Fountzilas G; Giannoulatou E
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Dec; 12(Suppl 9):181. PubMed ID: 31874647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing variant calling algorithms for target-exon sequencing in a large sample.
Lo Y; Kang HM; Nelson MR; Othman MI; Chissoe SL; Ehm MG; Abecasis GR; Zöllner S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 16():75. PubMed ID: 25884587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
