260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34975002)
1. Risk of breast implant removal after one- versus two-stage breast reconstructive surgery.
Theunissen CIJM; Brohet RM; Hu Y; van Uchelen JH; Mensen JHC; van Rijssen AL
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 May; 75(5):1610-1616. PubMed ID: 34975002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using National Real-World Data.
Becherer BE; Heeg E; Young-Afat DA; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Rakhorst HA; Mureau MAM;
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 36729987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immediate surgical mesh-free implant-based breast reconstruction with fascial flap in breast cancer patients after mastectomy.
Chen AX; Chen X; Yu Y; Wang X; Zhang B; Cao XC
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 307(6):1941-1948. PubMed ID: 36477273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.
Gao P; Bai P; Ren Y; Kong X; Wang Z; Fang Y; Wang J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2581-2590. PubMed ID: 34350500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subpectoral versus prepectoral two-stage breast reconstruction: A propensity score-matched analysis of 30-day morbidity and long-term outcomes.
Escandón JM; Sweitzer K; Christiano JG; Gooch JC; Olzinski AT; Prieto PA; Skinner KA; Langstein HN; Manrique OJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Jan; 76():76-87. PubMed ID: 36513014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast Reconstruction Outcomes with and without Strattice: Long-Term Outcomes of a Multicenter Study Comparing Strattice Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction with Submuscular Implant Reconstruction.
Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; Johnson RK; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Harvey JR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Jul; 152(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 36728408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique.
Toh U; Takenaka M; Iwakuma N; Akagi Y
Surg Today; 2021 Jun; 51(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 33185799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal breast reconstruction type for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy followed by radiation therapy.
Naoum GE; Oladeru OT; Niemierko A; Salama L; Winograd J; Colwell A; Arafat WO; Smith B; Ho A; Taghian AG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):127-136. PubMed ID: 32607638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Decade of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Lessons Learned in 3035 Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions.
Lin AM; Lorenzi R; Van Der Hulst JE; Liao EC; Austen WG; Webster A; Smith BL; Colwell AS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Feb; 153(2):277-287. PubMed ID: 37141449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wise Pattern versus Transverse Pattern Mastectomy in Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Escandón JM; Butterfield JA; Christiano JG; Gooch JC; Olzinski AT; Prieto PA; Skinner KA; Langstein HN; Manrique OJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Oct; 152(4S):69S-80S. PubMed ID: 37220238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Brandberg Y; Frisell J
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2127806. PubMed ID: 34596671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal reconstructive strategies in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy - A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
O'Donnell JPM; Murphy D; Ryan ÉJ; Gasior SA; Sugrue R; O'Neill BL; Boland MR; Lowery AJ; Kerin MJ; McInerney NM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 47(11):2797-2806. PubMed ID: 34301444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous Fat Grafting During Tissue Expander-to-Implant Exchange: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Escandón JM; Ali-Khan S; Christiano JG; Gooch JC; Olzinski AT; Prieto PA; Skinner KA; Langstein HN; Manrique OJ
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Oct; 47(5):1695-1706. PubMed ID: 36271157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Prepectoral Breast Tissue Expander Reconstruction Intraoperative Fill: Air or Saline?
Bamba R; Christopher L; Mailey BA; Mercho R; Dawson SE; Hadad I; Lester ME; Hassanein AH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):577e-580e. PubMed ID: 36729976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing Nipple-sparing Mastectomy to Secondary Nipple Reconstruction: A Multi-institutional Study.
Santosa KB; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Pusic AL; Chun YS; Wilkins EG; Kozlow JH
Ann Surg; 2021 Aug; 274(2):390-395. PubMed ID: 31469747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
