171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34975042)
1. Impact of biliary stents on the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic head lesions: A multicenter study.
Crinò SF; Conti Bellocchi MC; Antonini F; Macarri G; Carrara S; Lamonaca L; Di Mitri R; Conte E; Fabbri C; Binda C; Ofosu A; Gasparini E; Turri C; Stornello C; Celsa C; Larghi A; Manfrin E; Gabbrielli A; Facciorusso A; Tacelli M
Endosc Ultrasound; 2021; 10(6):440-447. PubMed ID: 34975042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biliary plastic stent does not influence the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic head masses performed with core biopsy needles.
Antonini F; Fuccio L; Giorgini S; Fabbri C; Frazzoni L; Scarpelli M; Macarri G
Dig Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 49(8):898-902. PubMed ID: 28465092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of biliary stents on the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: A single-center retrospective study and meta-analysis.
Endo G; Ishigaki K; Hamada T; Nakai Y; Ishida K; Kurihara K; Tange S; Takaoka S; Tokito Y; Suzuki Y; Oyama H; Kanai S; Suzuki T; Sato T; Hakuta R; Saito T; Takahara N; Fujishiro M
DEN Open; 2024 Apr; 4(1):e250. PubMed ID: 37441156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lower yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with pancreatic head mass with a biliary stent.
Kim JJ; Walia S; Lee SH; Patel B; Vetsa M; Zhao Y; Srikureja W; Laine L
Dig Dis Sci; 2015 Feb; 60(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 25245115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do Biliary Stents Affect EUS-Guided Tissue Acquisition (EUS-TA) in Solid Pancreatic Lesions Determining Biliary Obstruction? A Literature Review with Meta-Analysis.
Facciorusso A; Chandan S; Gkolfakis P; Ramai D; Mohan BP; Lisotti A; Conti Bellocchi MC; Papanikolaou IS; Mangiavillano B; Triantafyllou K; Manthopoulou E; Mare R; Fusaroli P; Crinò SF
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Mar; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 36980675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration
Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Madruga-Neto AC; Ryou M; Thompson CC
World J Clin Cases; 2021 Dec; 9(34):10507-10517. PubMed ID: 35004982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of biliary stenting in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition among patients with pancreatic cancer.
Constantinescu A; Plotogea OM; Stan-Ilie M; Ciurea T; Gheonea DI; Ungureanu BS; Bălan G; Rinja E; Panic N; Şandru V; Constantinescu G
J Clin Ultrasound; 2022 Jul; 50(6):844-849. PubMed ID: 35254661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of metal and plastic stents on endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology and core histology of head of pancreas masses.
Bekkali NLH; Nayar MK; Leeds JS; Thornton L; Johnson SJ; Haugk B; Darné A; Howard-Tripp N; Charnley RM; Bassett P; Oppong KW
Endoscopy; 2019 Nov; 51(11):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 30654396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the influence of plastic and fully covered metal biliary stents on the accuracy of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
Siddiqui AA; Fein M; Kowalski TE; Loren DE; Eloubeidi MA
Dig Dis Sci; 2012 Sep; 57(9):2438-45. PubMed ID: 22526586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal number of needle passes during EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions with 22G ProCore needles and different suction techniques: A randomized controlled trial.
Zhou W; Li SY; Jiang H; Gao L; Li J; Kong XY; Yang L; Fang AQ; Jin ZD; Wang KX
Endosc Ultrasound; 2021; 10(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 33586696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Clin Endosc; 2020 Sep; 53(5):600-610. PubMed ID: 31794654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
