152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34976637)
21. Taxation of sugar sweetened beverages and unhealthy foods: a qualitative study of key opinion leaders' views.
Tamir O; Cohen-Yogev T; Furman-Assaf S; Endevelt R
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2018 Jul; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 30064503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. No long-term store marketing changes following sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation: Oakland, California.
Zenk SN; Li Y; Leider J; Pipito AA; Powell LM
Health Place; 2021 Mar; 68():102512. PubMed ID: 33517072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Retailer perspectives on sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in the California Bay Area.
Ponce J; Yuan H; Schillinger D; Mahmood H; Lee M; Falbe J; Daniels R; Madsen KA
Prev Med Rep; 2020 Sep; 19():101129. PubMed ID: 32612904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An Assessment of Food Store Compliance With the Cook County Sweetened Beverage Tax.
El-Sayed OM; Pipito AA; Leider J; Chriqui JF; Powell LM
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2020; 26(4):E20-E23. PubMed ID: 32437118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Customer Characteristics and Shopping Patterns Associated with Healthy and Unhealthy Purchases at Small and Non-traditional Food Stores.
Lenk KM; Caspi CE; Harnack L; Laska MN
J Community Health; 2018 Feb; 43(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 28616707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. State sales tax rates for soft drinks and snacks sold through grocery stores and vending machines, 2007.
Chriqui JF; Eidson SS; Bates H; Kowalczyk S; Chaloupka FJ
J Public Health Policy; 2008 Jul; 29(2):226-49. PubMed ID: 18523476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Legal and Administrative Feasibility of a Federal Junk Food and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax to Improve Diet.
Pomeranz JL; Wilde P; Huang Y; Micha R; Mozaffarian D
Am J Public Health; 2018 Feb; 108(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 29320289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. State-of-the-art for food taxes to promote public health.
Jensen JD; Smed S
Proc Nutr Soc; 2018 May; 77(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 29166954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Employment impacts of the San Francisco sugar-sweetened beverage tax 2 years after implementation.
Marinello S; Leider J; Powell LM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252094. PubMed ID: 34077430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of Changes in Beverage Prices and Volume Sold Following the Implementation and Repeal of a Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois.
Powell LM; Leider J
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Dec; 3(12):e2031083. PubMed ID: 33369659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mexican Households' Purchases of Foods and Beverages Vary by Store-Type, Taxation Status, and SES.
Pedraza LS; Popkin BM; Salgado JC; Taillie LS
Nutrients; 2018 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 30096817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Changes in Beverage Marketing at Stores Following the Oakland Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.
Zenk SN; Leider J; Pugach O; Pipito AA; Powell LM
Am J Prev Med; 2020 May; 58(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 32192801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Oakland's sugar-sweetened beverage tax: Impacts on prices, purchases and consumption by adults and children.
Cawley J; Frisvold D; Hill A; Jones D
Econ Hum Biol; 2020 May; 37():100865. PubMed ID: 32126505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment.
Caro JC; Corvalán C; Reyes M; Silva A; Popkin B; Taillie LS
PLoS Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):e1002597. PubMed ID: 29969444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of on-shelf sugar labeling on beverage sales in the supermarket: a comparative interrupted time series analysis of a natural experiment.
Hoenink JC; Stuber JM; Lakerveld J; Waterlander W; Beulens JWJ; Mackenbach JD
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2021 Apr; 18(1):49. PubMed ID: 33823851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of an abrupt increase in taxes on candy and soda in Norway: an observational study of retail sales.
Øvrebø B; Halkjelsvik TB; Meisfjord JR; Bere E; Hart RK
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Sep; 17(1):115. PubMed ID: 32928228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of restricted retail merchandising of discretionary food and beverages on population diet: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
Brimblecombe J; McMahon E; Ferguson M; De Silva K; Peeters A; Miles E; Wycherley T; Minaker L; Greenacre L; Gunther A; Chappell E; Chatfield MD; Mah CL
Lancet Planet Health; 2020 Oct; 4(10):e463-e473. PubMed ID: 33038320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Obesity prevention strategies: could food or soda taxes improve health?
Encarnação R; Lloyd-Williams F; Bromley H; Capewell S
J R Coll Physicians Edinb; 2016 Mar; 46(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 27092368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diné Navajo Resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Denetclaw WF; Otto ZK; Christie S; Allen E; Cruz M; Potter KA; Mehta KM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272089. PubMed ID: 35925907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. US Policies That Define Foods for Junk Food Taxes, 1991-2021.
Pomeranz JL; Cash SB; Mozaffarian D
Milbank Q; 2023 Jun; 101(2):560-600. PubMed ID: 37101340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
