BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34978001)

  • 1. Binding free energies for the SAMPL8 CB8 "Drugs of Abuse" challenge from umbrella sampling combined with Hamiltonian replica exchange.
    Markthaler D; Kraus H; Hansen N
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Jan; 36(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 34978001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A replica exchange umbrella sampling (REUS) approach to predict host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL8 challenge.
    Ghorbani M; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Aviat F; Meana-Pañeda R; Klauda JB; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 May; 35(5):667-677. PubMed ID: 33939083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
    Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absolute binding free energies for the SAMPL6 cucurbit[8]uril host-guest challenge via the AMOEBA polarizable force field.
    Laury ML; Wang Z; Gordon AS; Ponder JW
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1087-1095. PubMed ID: 30324303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method.
    Han K; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Nishikawa N; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1059-1073. PubMed ID: 30084077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.
    Rizzi A; Murkli S; McNeill JN; Yao W; Sullivan M; Gilson MK; Chiu MW; Isaacs L; Gibb BC; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):937-963. PubMed ID: 30415285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
    Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thermodynamic integration to predict host-guest binding affinities.
    Lawrenz M; Wereszczynski J; Ortiz-Sánchez JM; Nichols SE; McCammon JA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 22350568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blinded predictions of standard binding free energies: lessons learned from the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Papadourakis M; Bosisio S; Michel J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 30159717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.
    Amezcua M; Setiadi J; Ge Y; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Oct; 36(10):707-734. PubMed ID: 36229622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AMOEBA binding free energies for the SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest challenge.
    Shi Y; Laury ML; Wang Z; Ponder JW
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 33140208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Converging free energies of binding in cucurbit[7]uril and octa-acid host-guest systems from SAMPL4 using expanded ensemble simulations.
    Monroe JI; Shirts MR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 24610238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A General Picture of Cucurbit[8]uril Host-Guest Binding.
    Sun Z; Huai Z; He Q; Liu Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Dec; 61(12):6107-6134. PubMed ID: 34818004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.
    Muddana HS; Fenley AT; Mobley DL; Gilson MK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 24599514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of the alchemical transfer and potential of mean force methods to the SAMPL8 host-guest blinded challenge.
    Azimi S; Wu JZ; Khuttan S; Kurtzman T; Deng N; Gallicchio E
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Jan; 36(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 35059940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Energy-entropy method using multiscale cell correlation to calculate binding free energies in the SAMPL8 host-guest challenge.
    Ali HS; Chakravorty A; Kalayan J; de Visser SP; Henchman RH
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Aug; 35(8):911-921. PubMed ID: 34264476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of SAMPL4 host-guest binding affinities using funnel metadynamics.
    Hsiao YW; Söderhjelm P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 24535628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binding free energy predictions in host-guest systems using Autodock4. A retrospective analysis on SAMPL6, SAMPL7 and SAMPL8 challenges.
    Casbarra L; Procacci P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jun; 35(6):721-729. PubMed ID: 34027592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational scheme for pH-dependent binding free energy calculation with explicit solvent.
    Lee J; Miller BT; Brooks BR
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):231-43. PubMed ID: 26189656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.