171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34978202)
1. How Does Age Affect Urinary Continence following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy? A Prospective Multi-Institutional Study Using Independently Collected, Validated Questionnaires.
Gondoputro W; Thompson J; Evans M; Bolton D; Frydenberg M; Murphy DG; Haynes AM; Agrawal S; Stricker P; Papa N
J Urol; 2022 May; 207(5):1048-1056. PubMed ID: 34978202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ficarra V; Novara G; Rosen RC; Artibani W; Carroll PR; Costello A; Menon M; Montorsi F; Patel VR; Stolzenburg JU; Van der Poel H; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Mottrie A
Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 22749852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching.
Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of urinary and sexual patient-reported outcomes between open radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matched, population-based study in Victoria.
Rechtman M; Forbes A; Millar JL; Evans M; Dodds L; Murphy DG; Evans SM
BMC Urol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):18. PubMed ID: 35130897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of postoperative urinary continence and incontinence types between conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Makino T; Naito R; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Aug; 42(6):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 37096807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective assessment of time-dependent changes in quality of life of Japanese patients with prostate cancer following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Miyake H; Miyazaki A; Furukawa J; Hinata N; Fujisawa M
J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 26885662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Coelho RF; Chauhan S; Orvieto MA; Sivaraman A; Palmer KJ; Coughlin G; Patel VR
Eur Urol; 2011 Jan; 59(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 20801579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of modified bladder neck suspension on early recovery of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Moon HW; Rhew SA; Yoon CE; Kwon HJ; Park YH; Lee JY
J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2279-2285. PubMed ID: 37336839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retzius-sparing technique independently predicts early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kadhim H; Ang KM; Tan WS; Nathan A; Pavan N; Mazzon G; Al-Kadhi O; Di G; Dinneen E; Briggs T; Kelkar A; Rajan P; Nathan S; Kelly JD; Sooriakumaran P; Sridhar A
J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1419-1426. PubMed ID: 35192106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Geraerts I; Van Poppel H; Devoogdt N; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Joniau S; Van Kampen M
BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):936-43. PubMed ID: 23937206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series.
Kowalczyk KJ; Madi RH; Eden CG; Sooriakumaran P; Fransis K; Raskin Y; Joniau S; Johnson S; Jacobsohn K; Galfano A; Bocciardi AM; Hwang J; Kim IY; Hu JC
J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 34181471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomised comparison of techniques for control of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Feng T; Heulitt G; Lee JJ; Liao M; Li HF; Porter JR
BJU Int; 2020 Nov; 126(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32521115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variations in predictors for urinary continence recovery at different time periods following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Nitta M; Tazawa M; Takahashi K; Naruse J; Oda K; Kano T; Uchida T; Umemoto T; Ogawa T; Kawamura Y; Hasegawa M; Shoji S; Miyajima A
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2024 Jan; 17(1):e13243. PubMed ID: 37740401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recovery of pad-free continence in elderly men does not differ from younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for aggressive prostate cancer.
Nyarangi-Dix JN; Tosev G; Damgov I; Reimold P; Aksoy C; Hatiboglu G; Teber D; Mansour J; Kuehhas FE; Radtke JP; Hohenfellner M
World J Urol; 2020 Feb; 38(2):351-360. PubMed ID: 31079187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The preoperative pad test as a predictor of urinary incontinence and quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective, observational, clinical study.
Kurimura Y; Haga N; Yanagida T; Tanji R; Onagi A; Honda R; Matsuoka K; Hoshi S; Hata J; Onoda M; Sato Y; Akaihata H; Kataoka M; Ogawa S; Ishibashi K; Matsubara A; Kojima Y
Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Jan; 52(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 31571159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Randomized Study of Intraoperative Autologous Retropubic Urethral Sling on Urinary Control after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Nguyen HG; Punnen S; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Cary C; Welty C; Weinberg V; Cooperberg MR; Meng MV; Greene KL; Garcia M; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2017 Feb; 197(2):369-375. PubMed ID: 27693447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence.
Kadono Y; Ueno S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Takezawa Y; Nakashima K; Nohara T; Izumi K; Mizokami A; Gabata T; Namiki M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 26352154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up.
Abdel Raheem A; Hagras A; Ghaith A; Alenzi MJ; Elghiaty A; Gameel T; Alowidah I; Ham WS; Choi YD; El-Bahnasy AH; Omar A; El-Bendary M; Rha KH
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Oct; 72(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32748620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
