These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34978838)

  • 1. A flexible moderated factor analysis approach to test for measurement invariance across a continuous variable.
    Molenaar D
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Dec; 26(6):660-679. PubMed ID: 34978838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonlinear Indicator-Level Moderation in Latent Variable Models.
    Bolsinova M; Molenaar D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):62-84. PubMed ID: 30513219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing measurement invariance with moderated nonlinear factor analysis using the R package OpenMx.
    Kolbe L; Molenaar D; Jak S; Jorgensen TD
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):388-406. PubMed ID: 35786980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning.
    Bauer DJ
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):507-526. PubMed ID: 27266798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mixture multigroup factor analysis for unraveling factor loading noninvariance across many groups.
    De Roover K; Vermunt JK; Ceulemans E
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Jun; 27(3):281-306. PubMed ID: 33271027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes.
    Wu H; Estabrook R
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1014-1045. PubMed ID: 27402166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring Factor Model Parameters across Continuous Variables with Local Structural Equation Models.
    Hildebrandt A; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A; Sommer C; Wilhelm O
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(2-3):257-8. PubMed ID: 27049892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjusting for partial invariance in latent parameter estimation: Comparing forward specification search and approximate invariance methods.
    Lai MHC; Liu Y; Tse WW
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Feb; 54(1):414-434. PubMed ID: 34236670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups.
    Marsh HW; Guo J; Parker PD; Nagengast B; Asparouhov T; Muthén B; Dicke T
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):524-545. PubMed ID: 28080078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures.
    Liu Y; Millsap RE; West SG; Tein JY; Tanaka R; Grimm KJ
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):486-506. PubMed ID: 27213981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Permutation randomization methods for testing measurement equivalence and detecting differential item functioning in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis.
    Jorgensen TD; Kite BA; Chen PY; Short SD
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Dec; 23(4):708-728. PubMed ID: 29172611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters.
    Jak S; Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):430-455. PubMed ID: 31670537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Score-based tests of measurement invariance: use in practice.
    Wang T; Merkle EC; Zeileis A
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():438. PubMed ID: 24936190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting.
    Luong R; Flake JK
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Aug; 28(4):905-924. PubMed ID: 35588078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological and statistical advances in the consideration of cultural diversity in assessment: A critical review of group classification and measurement invariance testing.
    Han K; Colarelli SM; Weed NC
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1481-1496. PubMed ID: 31763873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the assessment of measurement invariance: Using regularization to select anchor items and identify differential item functioning.
    Belzak WCM; Bauer DJ
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Dec; 25(6):673-690. PubMed ID: 31916799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing for measurement invariance with respect to an ordinal variable.
    Merkle EC; Fan J; Zeileis A
    Psychometrika; 2014 Oct; 79(4):569-84. PubMed ID: 24282129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of violations of measurement invariance in cross-lagged panel mediation models.
    Xu J; Zhang Q; Yang Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Dec; 52(6):2623-2645. PubMed ID: 32519290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
    Meredith W; Teresi JA
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Bayesian goodness of fit test and semiparametric generalization of logistic regression with measurement data.
    Schörgendorfer A; Branscum AJ; Hanson TE
    Biometrics; 2013 Jun; 69(2):508-19. PubMed ID: 23489010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.